The SHILLARY Campaign lawyers are attempting to utilize an insane defense strategy.
They committed treason, and are claiming that they should not be prosecuted for their crimes because the case is incoherent and too complicated for a jury to understand.
This is why these high level crime organizations use so many proxies.
To convolute and distort their network to make it difficult to discover and prosecute if they were to get caught. As well as obviously insulate the people at the top.
The Clinton legal team stooping to this level indicates they are running out of options
And the response from Durham was...
** the legal equivalent of saying -
That bullshit isn’t going to work, we caught you.
He cited THE MAXWELL CASE as a legal precedent that there does not need to be a defined pact in writing to prove a conspiracy. Going on to cite the proof of the greater conspiracy network.
Pause
Clinton campaign lawyers have been indicted and are implicated in a literal “conspiracy” as per the US DOJ
The corrupt left-wing media simply refuse to acknowledge this reality.
Therefore their sheep don’t know anything about this case and their sense of reality manipulated by the omission of fact.
Citing the Maxwell case was a not so subtle jab to the Clinton camp.
IT WAS / IS A MESSAGE
A not so friendly reminder that we are prosecuting their pedo friends in a highly complex federal conspiracy case as we speak. We are coming for all of them.
Everyone should feel incredibly motivated by the posture of the Durham team and their no-nonsense approach to this case.
Don’t get discouraged just because you don’t see headlines on MSM.
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED
-Clandestine-
PROPS to Clandestine for his assessment and breakdown.
N.
C.
S.
W.
I.
C.
Possibly unpopular opinion: Durham is a feint and will fail.
I say this primarily for two reasons:
-Despite working very quietly (as a good prosecutor should), the cabal has known about Durham for two years, giving them time to tighten up their ship
-Q made several mentions about the inability to get a fair trial in D.C. given that 90%+ of the population is compromised and/or ardently leftwing. (examples: 1553, 1660, 2070).
As good as Durham's initial case is looking, I'm skeptical that there will be a serious conviction given the composition of the jury.
Q made multiple references to a "stealth bomber". Some believed the SB was Barr. That seems highly unlikely unless Barr left a poison pill(s) for the cabal/DS.
I firmly believe that there is another legal avenue that the good guys are pursuing beyond what we've been told. What that is, I do not yet know.
Regardless the specific facts are presented through a court of law. The truth will be out for the world to see. If a group of peers don't prosecute, the true public WILL NOT LET THEM WALK DOWN THE STREET. Factually and metaphorically the life the Clintons know is slipping away. Durham is and will be very effective.