The occult knowledge of Freemasonry is not an evil in and of itself , yet the masons have been subverted in nwo errand boys for quite some. I time have no concern his occultic knowledge as a strong Christian. l'd like to hear more about him supposedly channeling demons. I would not entertain this without a direct source. He never channeled entities before. You or your friend may have been reading about Atlantis Atlantis, where the Sons of Beliel are mentioned throughout and the two you mentioned them, would but have been among them.
l'd like to hear more about him supposedly channeling demons. I would not entertain this without a direct source.
It was not Cayce directly channeling demons. It was during a regular reading of Cayce when this "Azazel" (or other ancient name for Satan) popped in and began speaking through Cayce in a completely different and shrill voice.
It would have been in one of the two last books i read on the subject:
"Edgar Cayce On Jesus and His Church," By Ann Read, edited by Hugh Lynn Cayce.
OR
"Edgar Cayce's Story of Jesus," by Jeffrey Furst .
Sorry that I cannot provide more specific information. I'm not going to dig out those old paperback books and search it out.
Take it for what you will.
The occult knowledge of Freemasonry is not an evil in and of itself
The source to refute this can be found in the book, "Morals and Dogma," written by Albert Pike, former Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry.
In it, he says that Freemasonry is "identical" to the "Ancient Mysteries."
You likely are aware that the "Ancient Mysteries," is PAGANISM.
And I assume you are aware that the primary object of Paganism is worship of the Sun god, which is also known as the "light bearer," or Lucifer.
Lucifer is also known as Satan.
In Holy Scripture and other sources he is identified as Baal, or Bel, or as Jesus names him in Luke.11[18] Beelzebub = Satan.
It takes a few steps to sift through Freemasonry's plausible deniability. But at the foundation you will find Satanism.
If they have a good secret, why do you suppose they keep it secret?
Do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
The occult knowledge of Freemasonry is not an evil in and of itself , yet the masons have been subverted in nwo errand boys for quite some. I time have no concern his occultic knowledge as a strong Christian. l'd like to hear more about him supposedly channeling demons. I would not entertain this without a direct source. He never channeled entities before. You or your friend may have been reading about Atlantis Atlantis, where the Sons of Beliel are mentioned throughout and the two you mentioned them, would but have been among them.
It was not Cayce directly channeling demons. It was during a regular reading of Cayce when this "Azazel" (or other ancient name for Satan) popped in and began speaking through Cayce in a completely different and shrill voice.
It would have been in one of the two last books i read on the subject:
"Edgar Cayce On Jesus and His Church," By Ann Read, edited by Hugh Lynn Cayce.
OR
"Edgar Cayce's Story of Jesus," by Jeffrey Furst .
Sorry that I cannot provide more specific information. I'm not going to dig out those old paperback books and search it out.
Take it for what you will.
The source to refute this can be found in the book, "Morals and Dogma," written by Albert Pike, former Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry.
In it, he says that Freemasonry is "identical" to the "Ancient Mysteries."
You likely are aware that the "Ancient Mysteries," is PAGANISM.
And I assume you are aware that the primary object of Paganism is worship of the Sun god, which is also known as the "light bearer," or Lucifer.
Lucifer is also known as Satan.
In Holy Scripture and other sources he is identified as Baal, or Bel, or as Jesus names him in Luke.11[18] Beelzebub = Satan.
It takes a few steps to sift through Freemasonry's plausible deniability. But at the foundation you will find Satanism.
If they have a good secret, why do you suppose they keep it secret?
Do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
I have already done mine.
And the conclusions are clear and irrefutable.
Knowledge and practice of the occult are two very different things and I was obviously not talking about practice.