Any similarities after 10 years? Both teachers...............
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/14/us/sandy-hook-shooting-victims-9th-anniversary/index.html
https://www.wjtv.com/news/warrior-teacher-eva-mireles-killed-in-texas-school-shooting/
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Here is a pic of "Rachel D'Avino". I put that in quotes because Rachel might be Sarah. With more to that story here.
Compare that to this pic of Eva Mirales a decade later.
I think this pic is the same Eva Mirales as the one that was "killed" in Uvalde, but she appears quite a bit heavier. Here is her website that tells all about how great she is at teaching.
Here is a pic of Rachel D'Avino that is also very overweight (taken from the "Sarah" link above). Compare that to the Eva Mirales overweight pic above.
I think it is very possible they are the same person.
D'Avino
Doesn't look like Mireles
Did you look at all the pics? The teeth look very similar, the distance between the eyes, nose, mouth, chin, cheeks, shape of those things are all similar enough. Remember, there is also a ten year gap, and it looks like lots of weight changes. Look at all the pictures.
I have, they don't look the same. Every shooting, terror attack or whatever these types of posts pop up. It's all opinion. Some might think they look alike, some will think they don't.
It's not "just" opinion. Computers recognize faces by measuring distances between points. The distance between the eyes, the distance from the eyes to the mouth, nose, ears, chin, cheeks, etc.. These are all measurable quantities. The shape of the teeth, the line they make, the distance between them, are all quantifiable.
While an actual computer running these measurements is far better than what I have offered, we can still offer our own analysis. In that context it is "opinion" but it is more than just opinion when you give reasons why you have an opinion.
When you say, "I don't think that's true," THAT is "just opinion." When you say, the distance between the eyes looks different to me, or the teeth are too short in one over the other, that is analysis. Still a form of opinion, or at least bias, but it is more than "just" opinion, because it progresses the analysis forward.
I have offered evidence for my assertion and asked for others analysis, noting the points of interest (the same ones a computer uses). You have offered only opinion in return. If you offer analysis, points of contention, even though they may not be quantified, they are still places to look and perhaps measure, then the debate can advance.