Any similarities after 10 years? Both teachers...............
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/14/us/sandy-hook-shooting-victims-9th-anniversary/index.html
https://www.wjtv.com/news/warrior-teacher-eva-mireles-killed-in-texas-school-shooting/
Any similarities after 10 years? Both teachers...............
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/14/us/sandy-hook-shooting-victims-9th-anniversary/index.html
https://www.wjtv.com/news/warrior-teacher-eva-mireles-killed-in-texas-school-shooting/
Did you look at all the pics? The teeth look very similar, the distance between the eyes, nose, mouth, chin, cheeks, shape of those things are all similar enough. Remember, there is also a ten year gap, and it looks like lots of weight changes. Look at all the pictures.
User is Leonard Pozner himself. He won't stop lying and shilling until booted out.
I have, they don't look the same. Every shooting, terror attack or whatever these types of posts pop up. It's all opinion. Some might think they look alike, some will think they don't.
It's not "just" opinion. Computers recognize faces by measuring distances between points. The distance between the eyes, the distance from the eyes to the mouth, nose, ears, chin, cheeks, etc.. These are all measurable quantities. The shape of the teeth, the line they make, the distance between them, are all quantifiable.
While an actual computer running these measurements is far better than what I have offered, we can still offer our own analysis. In that context it is "opinion" but it is more than just opinion when you give reasons why you have an opinion.
When you say, "I don't think that's true," THAT is "just opinion." When you say, the distance between the eyes looks different to me, or the teeth are too short in one over the other, that is analysis. Still a form of opinion, or at least bias, but it is more than "just" opinion, because it progresses the analysis forward.
I have offered evidence for my assertion and asked for others analysis, noting the points of interest (the same ones a computer uses). You have offered only opinion in return. If you offer analysis, points of contention, even though they may not be quantified, they are still places to look and perhaps measure, then the debate can advance.
Here's another Mireles photo. Still doesn't look like D'Avino
Mireles
Quite a difference in the cheekbones of the two women.
Here's D'Avino looking at the camera, doesn't look like Mireles.
D'Avino
Noses are different
That was one of the pictures presented above. Looking at the distance between the tip of the cheekbones to the eyes to the tip of the nose to the top of the mouth to the tip of the chin/width of the chin/distance between cheekbones/eyes, all those distances look the same to me.
Can you be more specific as to what you think is different? Remember, if you look at all the pictures of both Eva and "Rachel" there are large age and weight differences. Look at the tips (i.e. the underlying bones), not the flesh.
I have a lot of info on these now-adult children but won't go into it because it was not their decision to be used in a demonic ritual.
Here are Rachael's sisters. They don't look like Mireles either.
D'Avino sisters
Mike, you been on the forum for 6 months and it seems the "ONLY" posts you try to disprove are about Sandy Hook. Seems kinda weird wouldnt you say?
It's Pozner, this is his "job".