You flatter yourself to imagine you're doing us a favor by being an agitation propagandist from reddit, an online cesspool that, as a whole, considers Q a "cult" to such an extent you've adopted the term in your flair.
You further flatter yourself to imagine we can't easily see through your thin veil of pseudo-neutrality; and that we have something important to "learn from" people who consider Q to be a cult.
We all know that over on reddit, reality isn't really a popular thing, so that partially explains your unfamiliarity with it.
You flatter yourself to imagine you're doing us a favor
I’m under no such illusion. My goal isn’t to convert anyone here, just to understand how you arrive at the perspectives that you do.
It’s hard to do that without presenting the obstacles that I encounter when attempting to reconcile your beliefs with my own and the beliefs of others.
If I can’t figure out how you respond to a counter-argument, then I don’t know how you’re managing the dissonance I experience when attempting to adopt that belief. It’s not malicious, just Socratic.
And to be clear, understanding the beliefs here is not simply “reading the Q posts”, because we’ve all done that, and every single one of us has a slightly different idea of what the Plan looks like and what the end result will be. Including among Q believers.
Talking with people is the best way of learning about their beliefs. I can just ask you questions rather than assume your answers or have the television tell me what you think about things. I can’t imagine a more direct means towards the truth about Q given the circumstances, can you?
If you’re talking about Christian views on things like evolution, it’s not that the Christian views aren’t tolerated. It’s that they can’t be tested or verified. It’s not falsifiable.
Doesn’t mean it’s wrong. But if it’s right, we can’t prove it one way or the other.
And, to be clear, there are plenty of Christians who work in science, psychology, academia, and so forth. Christian therapists are popular in more conservative states and are free to include religious principles in their work.
An equally fair question:
Why do you continue to agitate and bring your (occasionally subtle) anti-Q bullshit to a Q-positive board, instead of fucking right off?
Because good research can’t be done exclusively by a community of people who already accept the same conclusion.
It’s the same reason I don’t see much use in talking to people I agree with. Not much to learn from such conversation.
You flatter yourself to imagine you're doing us a favor by being an agitation propagandist from reddit, an online cesspool that, as a whole, considers Q a "cult" to such an extent you've adopted the term in your flair.
You further flatter yourself to imagine we can't easily see through your thin veil of pseudo-neutrality; and that we have something important to "learn from" people who consider Q to be a cult.
We all know that over on reddit, reality isn't really a popular thing, so that partially explains your unfamiliarity with it.
I’m under no such illusion. My goal isn’t to convert anyone here, just to understand how you arrive at the perspectives that you do.
It’s hard to do that without presenting the obstacles that I encounter when attempting to reconcile your beliefs with my own and the beliefs of others.
If I can’t figure out how you respond to a counter-argument, then I don’t know how you’re managing the dissonance I experience when attempting to adopt that belief. It’s not malicious, just Socratic.
And to be clear, understanding the beliefs here is not simply “reading the Q posts”, because we’ve all done that, and every single one of us has a slightly different idea of what the Plan looks like and what the end result will be. Including among Q believers.
Talking with people is the best way of learning about their beliefs. I can just ask you questions rather than assume your answers or have the television tell me what you think about things. I can’t imagine a more direct means towards the truth about Q given the circumstances, can you?
Really? How do you explain Christian researchers? Are they not like minded?
I’m not sure what you’re asking.
If you’re talking about Christian views on things like evolution, it’s not that the Christian views aren’t tolerated. It’s that they can’t be tested or verified. It’s not falsifiable.
Doesn’t mean it’s wrong. But if it’s right, we can’t prove it one way or the other.
And, to be clear, there are plenty of Christians who work in science, psychology, academia, and so forth. Christian therapists are popular in more conservative states and are free to include religious principles in their work.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nathaniel-Wade/publication/236988696_Effectiveness_of_religiously_tailored_interventions_in_Christian_therapy/links/00b4951acb9acce4fe000000/Effectiveness-of-religiously-tailored-interventions-in-Christian-therapy.pdf
Did I misinterpret your question?