Thank you. I feel that people should pay more attention to the first half of the second amendment.
Regulated: Well provisioned, trained and disciplined.
In my opinion discipline should be part of regulated. An undisciplined person, for example a violent criminal or a teenager with serious problems with his SSRI medications, does not automatically qualify for full gun ownership. Feel free to disagree but I feel that is the spirit of the amendment.
So discipline has nothing to do with it? It sounds like you support violent criminals and out-of-control teenagers off their meds both having unlimited firepower and no supervision. That's your solution?
Thank you. I feel that people should pay more attention to the first half of the second amendment.
Regulated: Well provisioned, trained and disciplined.
In my opinion discipline should be part of regulated. An undisciplined person, for example a violent criminal or a teenager with serious problems with his SSRI medications, does not automatically qualify for full gun ownership. Feel free to disagree but I feel that is the spirit of the amendment.
No, shall not be infringed, is the part that needs to be adhered to! The first part means necessary and well working.
So discipline has nothing to do with it? It sounds like you support violent criminals and out-of-control teenagers off their meds both having unlimited firepower and no supervision. That's your solution?