Narcolepsy is hitting hard, so I gotta hit and run.
Durham has a plan.
How do you introduce evidence legally?
He's going after the low-hanging fruit first.
You can't indict Hillary without evidence. You can't get evidence without discovery. You can't get discovery without evidence. That's the game the Court plays, and the primary method crooked Judges use to avoid hearing cases -- hiding behind standing and foundational evidence.
It's a common liberal tactic.
"You can't prove it!"
"HERE! Just read this! It's clear as day evidence that Hillary is guilty!"
"I'm not reading anything until you prove your claims!"
...
So, how do you get around this tactic?
Well, discovery of evidence is valid between courts. If one court finds the evidence credible in their discovery phase, it can transfer over to another court.
So, since we can't find a single honest court to hear evidence against Hillary, we must be like Iron man and introduce seemingly unrelated evidential facts before smaller courts. Then, once they are all laid out together, a greater Conspiracy Framework comes into focus.
Please watch until the end:
https://youtu.be/5Rb9hAHifFA?t=151
Durham is putting it together, in a cave... With only a box of scraps.
Each case is gonna seemingly fizzle out and go nowhere. But each one is going to present small matters of fact that allude to a more in-depth conspiracy, until the foundation is laid and all bricks point towards Hillary and Obama.
How do you build a home? Foundation to structure (layers).
Layers (U1, Iran, Human Traffic, Haiti, Corruption, etc etc).
Q already laid out the checklist.
One leads to the other, like stacking bricks.
First comes corruption in the election.
Which leads to Haiti and their blood harvesting.
Which leads to Human Trafficking worldwide.
Which leads to Iran and Alice in the Bloody Wonderland (Saudi Arabia)
Which leads to the U1 deal to frame Russia and spark WW3
Which leads to... "We're saving Israel for last"
Durham is only getting started.
That's bad news if you expected this to end soon.
If each case is about 2-3 weeks, we're looking at about 4-5 months.
Right in time for October.
The Hunt is On.
To hide the fact he was building a suit and not a missile from the terrorists holding him captive, he split the blueprint for the suit onto several sheets of paper.
Only by lining them up under a backlight did the actual diagram come into shape.
Durham is doing the same thing with the matters of fact established in discovery.
Each minor case he brings against Hillary's cronies tacks on small little pieces of a larger case. Components of a larger whole.
They can't stop him because he is special counsel prosecutor. He HAS to bring cases before courts to do his job. They'd never let a Hillary case get off the ground though. They can't possibly know which small little facts he needs to introduce anymore than you can figure out how a million shattered pot shards fit together if all you have to go on is a photograph.
The facts he is accumulating in discovery from the minor court cases are locked into place and can be cross-referenced in different trials. That's something he can do as a special prosecutor investigating a wider conspiracy scheme. We all know not just one person was involved. The Court knows this as well.
It doesn't look like Durham is doing anything, because he is exclusively baking bricks and not laying a single one for the wall he was tasked to build. Once he has the last brick, however, the wall will manifest almost in a blink of the eye.
Does that clear it up?