Citizens look to elected officials to 'do something' after disasters and events like the Las Vegas FBI shooter. Maybe he was operating on the notion that the courts wouldn't uphold the ban, which they didn't. Then he could absolved of responsibility, not that he would have gotten credit in the MSM funhouse anyway
Huh? He "did something" evil that he was never going to get "credit" for anyway? He could have "done something" that could have actually helped such as crack down on psych drugs but instead he violated the law because of optics that he was never going to get which would have only re-enforced the brainwashing of the masses? Is that the example YOU would set?
I'm going to need actual logic before I can see these downvotes adding up.
So, your logic says that he has a long-planned secret operation with the white hats but wouldn't engage in any other action with another motive than what appears on the surface? Your thought is that he wouldn't allow a ban which would almost certainly be overturned, for the sake of optics? Right, gotcha. Thanks for setting me straight
I'm guessing that you think it's good to tell people that they really should get jabbed. Either Trump was simply duped on both of these issues or I'm going to call both of you evil.
The ONLY thing that compromise like this accomplishes is reinforcing delusions. You got any more of "my logic" for me?
Citizens look to elected officials to 'do something' after disasters and events like the Las Vegas FBI shooter. Maybe he was operating on the notion that the courts wouldn't uphold the ban, which they didn't. Then he could absolved of responsibility, not that he would have gotten credit in the MSM funhouse anyway
Huh? He "did something" evil that he was never going to get "credit" for anyway? He could have "done something" that could have actually helped such as crack down on psych drugs but instead he violated the law because of optics that he was never going to get which would have only re-enforced the brainwashing of the masses? Is that the example YOU would set?
I'm going to need actual logic before I can see these downvotes adding up.
So, your logic says that he has a long-planned secret operation with the white hats but wouldn't engage in any other action with another motive than what appears on the surface? Your thought is that he wouldn't allow a ban which would almost certainly be overturned, for the sake of optics? Right, gotcha. Thanks for setting me straight
I'm guessing that you think it's good to tell people that they really should get jabbed. Either Trump was simply duped on both of these issues or I'm going to call both of you evil.
The ONLY thing that compromise like this accomplishes is reinforcing delusions. You got any more of "my logic" for me?
Gee, no. With logic like that, I can tell you got it all fingered out