The Chinese government via State claims that elements within the United States Military are manufacturing food shortages in rival countries, with the usage of bugs as vectors to pass diseases to crops and wipe out food supply. Directly accuses them of breaching the Biological Weapons Convention.
These are not outlandish claims, as we all recall the US MIL utilizing animals as vectors in Ukraine such as migratory birds to spread pathogens.
Oh yeah, and they also have all the details up about it on DARPA’s public military website. They claim these genetically modified pathogens and bug vectors are used as “countermeasures against potential natural or engineered threats to the food supply chain”. Check it out ⬇️ https://www.darpa.mil/program/insect-allies
So just as the US claims they need to create genetically modified pathogens in Ukraine for “defensive” purposes, they also need to create insect armies with genetically modified pathogens, to “protect the food supply”.
Do you see the pattern here? The US Department of DEFENSE only seems to be engaged in OFFENSIVE activity. They are conducting offensive biological research under the guise of “defence”. And the other world powers are not happy about it. Especially considering these “defensive biological weapons” keep “getting out”.
Now here is the Breitbart article, and they are clearly not buying any of these accusations, but the accusations from the Chinese are significant nonetheless, given the militaristic implications to both Russia and China accusing the US of mass genocide and biological warfare. Also given how much the US has lied about EVERYTHING, we need to take all sides into account. If you believe we can blindly trust the US government, I have many bridges to sell you.
Here’s an extremely juicy passage from the article:
“Experts reached by the Global Times said the Insect Allies is turning this concern into real potential danger. ‘Why do they use insects as carriers? Why does the US build bio-labs near other countries like Russia? When the Pandora’s Box is opened, a series of disasters will follow,’ said an expert. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg as a project with a potential biological weapons threat. In addition to the Insect Allies program, the US has conducted biological experiments around the world in said notorious ‘bio-labs’ disregarding human safety and natural ethics while blatantly violating the ‘Biological Weapons Convention.’”
China State-sponsored media experts sure seem to sound a lot like me 😂
-Clandestine
(Shout out to Kelen from InfoWars for the tip on the story)
Well, I guess it takes all kinds? I kind of thought Q/Trump supporters were rule-of-law types as opposed to law-of-the-jungle. I always picture anarchy as looking like Chicago these days but maybe there's something about anarchy I don't understand
Ok. So, if both factions decide on a different set of rules, how does one seek justice when they are wronged by the other? Seems like it would be pretty chaotic in comparison. How would things not descend into a Mad Max sort of scenario? I'm not saying I'm in love with our system. The idea is good but it's been corrupted by the envious and greedy and needs to be reset.
Insert capitalist and you’ve adopted my position :). “Capitalism” is a Marxist term. One might consider abandoning it in favor of what the Founders termed “Free Enterprize.”
Pretty sure governments get created to squash the envious and greedy anarchists. Anarchy doesn't make much sense when considering the sinful nature of man. Governments suffer from the same problem, but they at least need to posture as being benevolent for a period of time, so imo you overall get better outcomes (and one could argue worse outcomes as well -- see: biolabs, military industrial complex, etc...).
https://blackrosefed.org/spain-anarchism-in-action/
It’s always good to learn from history. I always found it curious the way the term anarchy and anarchism morphed into what most people believe it to be today, which would be a free for all and chaos. It’s not that at all.
To sum it up in simple terms it is a voluntary collective of people that don’t believe in the authority of a minority group over the majority. It is much more democratic(everybody gets a say) and classless than almost every other form of government.
You can be an anarchist, but still have a moral code. It's kinda like just operating society based on morals, rather than bullshit laws a bunch of crooks put in place.
It sound like a great system for those who abide, and seconded on the bullshit, for-profit, unnecessary laws. My question is how to deal with those who choose not to act in the same manner. Another poster made it sound like the idea was capital punishment for those who don't, which sounds over-the-top.
Tar and feathers. Lol a judicial system is obviously necessary it just needs better control by the people, instead of the cronies.
Heard. I think that, at the point we are with blockchain tech, the representative system is redundant, burdensome and ripe for corruption. I think we can cut out the middleman and just start voting directly on many issues with an electoral-college model. It would certainly polarize the states but it's mostly like that now anyway. I would love to see a popular vote on ending the Fed.