So you basically are arguing against firearm ownership. To answer your question in the OP: You're arguing for death by a thousand cuts.
"Reasonable" restrictions, my ass. Every one of these shooters either acquired their weapons illegally, were known by law enforcement to be a potential threat that they did nothing about, or both. Those "reasonable" restrictions only stop the people who AREN'T a threat to a school full of children or a theater premier from accessing weapons to exercise their natural right to self defense. The criminals who WOULD shoot kids or theater patrons don't give a shit about the law.
So you basically are arguing against firearm ownership. To answer your question in the OP: You're arguing for death by a thousand cuts.
"Reasonable" restrictions, my ass. Every one of these shooters either acquired their weapons illegally, were known by law enforcement to be a potential threat that they did nothing about, or both. Those "reasonable" restrictions only stop the people who AREN'T a threat to a school full of children or a theater premier from accessing weapons to exercise their natural right to self defense. The criminals who WOULD shoot kids or theater patrons don't give a shit about the law.