2
Cheesecakecrush 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats the whole thing: its a fad. If they were "real women" they couldn't just wash off the poirly done makep, cut their hair, and put on jeans and a T shirt and be done being a woman once it wasnt trendy.

4
Cheesecakecrush 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd rather face the illnesses and have a stronger immune system, than having one that is knocked out by the slightest exposure.

1
Cheesecakecrush 1 point ago +1 / -0

That "B" needs to be erased, because most activists say its impossible to be bisexual, either your gay or straight.

7
Cheesecakecrush 7 points ago +7 / -0

It started as a tax collecting offshoot of the IRS, and ballooned out of control

1
Cheesecakecrush 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell me you're missing the point without saying you're missing the point: It didn't "slice through steel" The BUILDING ISN'T 100% STEEL. There are weak points the plane BROKE INTO PIECES and WENT THROUGH called WINDOWS. Unless you're telling me the windows were made of steel also?

Never said the nose cone went through the building either, but most of you are so set on the "muh no planes!" thing that you are thinking I'm arguing with some video that is the smoking gun proof, and not the holes in the arguments that make the whole thing sound weak.

And, by the way, you're weakening your own "no planes" argument by telling me how aluminum isn't strong enough to survive any impact at all. A 747 weighs 400,000 pounds, you can't tell me that much aluminum won't go through a few windows and cubicle walls. But I'd imagine it would go into the building in many pieces, along with all the fuel the plane has to carry, and probably explode in a big fireball. Kind of like what would happen.

-6
Cheesecakecrush -6 points ago +3 / -9

Okay, since the day has passed, I'm going to go ahead and "question" the narrative here much like you all are "questioning" the MSM narrative.

According to this board, I'm supposed to believe that there were no planes, or that its impossible for a plane to fly through a metal building because the planes are built of fragile aluminum, jet fuel can't melt steel beams, etc. I'm going to address these one at a time, while I want you to understand I'm sympathetic to the belief that the planes were cover for going to war in the middle east. Put on your thinking caps.

One: I won't believe there were no planes, because I WATCHED THE 2ND ONE LIVE. Yes I KNOW the MSM lies on a daily basis and act as the propaganda arm of the democrat party. But you will never convince me Planes never hit the towers. Am I supposed to believe there were no planes because of a video that pans up to the explosion already in progress? What does that prove other than that there was a fuel based explosion, thus supporting a plane impact?

2nd, Planes are made of aluminum, but Aluminum is actually a strong metal capable of much more than anyone here is giving it credit for. Just because your soft drink/beer cans are easily destroyed doesn't mean that Aluminum is weak. Combine this with the other claim that these buildings are made of Steel. Yes, Steel is strong! However, the BUILDINGS HAVE WINDOWS. Are the windows made of steel? THINK. Pretending a plane made of aluminum can't make it through a fucking glass window is ABSURD. At the speeds a passenger jet has to move to be airborne, combined with their own weight? Are you kidding me? THINK!

Jet fuel burns at 1500 degrees, which is IN FACT not hot enough to MELT steel beams! Absolutely true! HOWEVER: this ignores EVERYTHING humanity has learned about metallurgy and how steel is made and manipulated. Steel is typically forged above 1150 degrees C: meaning it can be shaped and manipulated BY HAND. How much does a skyscraper weigh? Over 200,000 TONS. Can you lift a single ton by hand? Maybe with adrenaline in an emergency, but normally no. Combine these two facts: You have several thousand tons of weight above a steel beam that is being heated to the point it could be hit with a claw hammer and start deforming. As soon as one part of the building collapses, ALL of that weight slams down on the floor beneath the weakened beam, shearing off the bolts strong enough to HOLD hundreds of thousands of tons of weight but not in an IMPACT, then that hits the next floor, compounding the failure and cascading all the way to the ground.

3
Cheesecakecrush 3 points ago +3 / -0

That explosion is consistent with fuel explosions. Its how they make them in hollywood to make them more dramatic. If it were a demolition charge it would've just been a super loud BANG and there would be little of the orange burning expanding bubble.

1
Cheesecakecrush 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plot twist: son is in middle school

1
Cheesecakecrush 1 point ago +1 / -0

This assumes media reporting is accurate and truthful. ALWAYS take anything you read from a mainstream source with a grain of salt.

Further, when they say a company "lost 27 billion" they mean in stock value.

1
Cheesecakecrush 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obama never got my vote but I know what you mean. He had black people the country over thinking they were gonna get free shit because a black man was gonna be president.

4
Cheesecakecrush 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hadn't even heard of him a month ago. Literally came out of nowhere, and he wants to be prez? No.

2
Cheesecakecrush 2 points ago +2 / -0

All this makes me wonder if Fani Willis is doing this as an ally of ours, and not an enemy. I know she's taking orders, but from whom? There is no way the enemy is so desperate that they would do this, thinking it would actually slow down Trump or stop him. The smartest thing they ever could have done was nothing, FROM THE BEGINNING.

view more: Next ›