There are certainly 'real' cases within those 300,000+ sealed indictments, but they can't all be handled as 'court cases' (or even tribunals) -- there simply isn't enough time to prosecute them all.
What if the vast majority of them are connected to asset forfeiture features of Trump's public (and possibly private) EO's?
What if the Trump/Q plan is to simply replace all our fake fiat dollars with gold-backed dollars --- except for the bad guys?
On some 'special' day in the near future, all of our bank balances simply get converted, one-to-one, for the new (real) dollars. For the average person, it would be the least-painful way to move forward.
But for the bad guys, their bank balances go to ZERO. And if they want to fight that, we unseal their indictment, where we have proof that they particiated in election fraud, or human trafficking, or treason, etc.
300,000+ indictments could cover everyone who participated directly, as well as every entity they have tried to 'park' or hide money with. Family members, trusts, companies, etc. Every single tentacle is covered by an indictment. Each indictment is a heaping pile of evidence which authorizes the asset forfeiture.
Accept the financial loss quietly, or suffer the exposure (and/or conviction, jail time, hanging, etc). Their choice. But if they fight, they do it without assets.
All US dollars held by the bad guys, anywhere in the world, simply 'evaporate'. The US will simply not honor the old bills, and the bad guys can't convert to the new ones (no one will accept 'old' bills that they can't convert).
As for non-cash assets, we can go collecting those over a period of years. These other assets, once liquidated, go to the (real) Treasury -- or to the people.
Could this work?
It would be awesome if that were true, but I don't believe assets could be taken simply because the government accuses you of something. Isn't that what we're all fighting against? I get the idea that to fight the case you open yourself to incriminating evidence but what about an innocent spouse? If they did nothing wrong can they have their half of marital assets taken? I don't think so. What about assets that backed a loan? Wouldn't the mortgage company have a right to their share of any assets? While it sounds great, I think there's much more to it than simply taking someone's assets.
Asset forfeiture has been a hotly debated topic for a couple decades. If they used it against them it would be so epic I cannot fathom it. This is literally my dream. Would unite the country. Who on right or left would really feel bad if these fucks were bankrupted.
The issue at hand isn't whether we'd enjoy watching it, but whether it'd be legal. There's a discussion at length going on elsewhere in the thread about the legality. However, if you'd prefer to form your own opinion, Moyer vs Peabody and Ex Parte Milligan are likely precedents coming into play. If you want my opinion, I think the D5 has been geniusly set up by Q and Mil teams. If you'd like to read the discussion, I replied to it earlier, or you can find user AllowMeToExplain in the thread.