What was the full title of Charles Darwin's "origin of species" ?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Evolution and the laws of thermodynamics are not equivalent they work on different scales entirely...
Because the animals that allowed the symbiotic relationship to occur benefited more highly from the relationship than those that didn't and it carried on over millions of years with MANY MANY mistakes inbetween
Can you prove your hypothesis? Can you create a scientific experiment that measures outcomes that proves you statement? In a symbiotic relationship, how are two organisms going to have simultaneous mutations that increase the survival of both species when the miniscule mutations don't benefit either species? In other words, the process must be complete for the organisms to survive. Increasing the process by millions of years doesn't change the dynamic. Unless the mutations have created a completed process simultaneously, resulting in the increased survivability of the species, then according to Darwin's theory, the mutations die out.
Can you do the same but for your belief? And not just put pseudo-science into a sentence and claim the award. Simultaneous mutations... you're taking 1 aspect of evolution theory and trying to make it fit each category. When people say simultaneous mutations they are in general referring to when 2 species have developed a trait even though they are half a world apart. Eyes and blood being good examples. Having the symbiotic relationship WAS the "mutation" People are inherently bad at big time and that is why it is hard to think of but just because something is difficult doesn't mean it is wrong