This one is a massive boom for not simply the US, but the Whole World. The Davos clique are NOT getting their way.
Oh, and in case they forgot: Nothing Can Stop What is Coming!
Source article: One Nation (freedom-oriented political party in Australia) publication. Date May 30, 2022
See part of the text below:
Source: https://www.onenation.org.au/who-forced-into-humiliating-backdown
Brilliant news out of Geneva today!
As most of you know, the World Health Assembly has spent the past 7 days considering Biden’s 13 controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, and the US spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.
The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists' way, came on Wednesday, the 25th of May, which just happened to also be Africa Day.
Botswana read a statement on behalf of its 47 AFRO members, saying they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.
Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either.
These included Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran and Malaysia. Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.
In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters were forced to back down.
They have not given up though – far from it. Instead, they did what they always do and 'pivoted'.
At their request, a new working group was convened to make "technical recommendations on the proposed amendments" which will be re-submitted along with the Pandemic Treaty, at the 77th Health Assembly meeting in 2024.
There has also been lots of pushback from Republicans in the US, with a number of them introducing new bills giving the US Congress/Senate powers to override any WHO mandates or directives issued as part of any international agreements.
One, called the 'No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act' has 15 co-sponsors and was introduced to the Senate on Thursday by Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who said "The sovereignty of the United States is not negotiable".
(See full text at source link)
Edit: WHO proposed Amendments, as proposed by Sleepy Joe's puppet masters.
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf
(Kudos to u/crashdaddy for the digs)
That was pretty interesting, so I looked up "Biden’s 13 controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations." From just a brief run-through, it looks like shilling--as in, "they really put up a fight, but we eventually compromised."
And then when you think about those amendments for about 9 more seconds, you realize that if someone from the WEF's "Global Leaders" is put into those decision-making positions -- as is the plan, from what I'm hearing -- then those amendments don't really change much of anything.
But I'd love to hear from someone who looked at it for more than 9 seconds.
More seconds are important. The amendments are what this interview talks about:
Man In America:
URGENT: W.H.O. Moves to Crush U.S. Sovereignty
If you even glance at them, you'll see that what these changes essentially do is remove the "State Party" (aka a sovereign nation) from the processes, and authorize the WHO to dictate what happens.
The amendments Do make a big difference, because they establish a legal framework for dictatorship. Sure, they have their players in place, but its simply part of tightening the nuts and bolts and locking down the New World Order more significantly, so that even if their players are removed - well, they have leverage and power anyway. Least, that's my reading on that.
Example page 8 of the doc you referenced (nice work by the way):
If the Director-General determines and the State Party are in agreement regarding this determination that the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, the Director-General shall, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the Committee established under Article 48 (hereinafter the “Emergency Committee”) on appropriate temporary recommendations.
The section in italics here is deleted in the amendments. So, regardless of whether the US or Australia or any other party to this 2005 treaty (?) disagree, it makes no difference to what the WHo does. The Dictator General simply does his declarations, etc, and its all up to the WHO, rather than there needing to be a consensus between the WHO and the countries involved in 'the crisis'.
Well, I think I applied at least 240 seconds. Maybe others can do better!
PS. Good digs. Link edited to original post.
Ah, the good ol’ “public health emergency of international concern” homophone is getting another airing… PHEIC… FAKE…