This one is a massive boom for not simply the US, but the Whole World. The Davos clique are NOT getting their way.
Oh, and in case they forgot: Nothing Can Stop What is Coming!
Source article: One Nation (freedom-oriented political party in Australia) publication. Date May 30, 2022
See part of the text below:
Source: https://www.onenation.org.au/who-forced-into-humiliating-backdown
Brilliant news out of Geneva today!
As most of you know, the World Health Assembly has spent the past 7 days considering Biden’s 13 controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, and the US spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.
The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists' way, came on Wednesday, the 25th of May, which just happened to also be Africa Day.
Botswana read a statement on behalf of its 47 AFRO members, saying they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.
Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either.
These included Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran and Malaysia. Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.
In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters were forced to back down.
They have not given up though – far from it. Instead, they did what they always do and 'pivoted'.
At their request, a new working group was convened to make "technical recommendations on the proposed amendments" which will be re-submitted along with the Pandemic Treaty, at the 77th Health Assembly meeting in 2024.
There has also been lots of pushback from Republicans in the US, with a number of them introducing new bills giving the US Congress/Senate powers to override any WHO mandates or directives issued as part of any international agreements.
One, called the 'No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act' has 15 co-sponsors and was introduced to the Senate on Thursday by Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who said "The sovereignty of the United States is not negotiable".
(See full text at source link)
Edit: WHO proposed Amendments, as proposed by Sleepy Joe's puppet masters.
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf
(Kudos to u/crashdaddy for the digs)
Just want to say as an Aussie, one nation aren't really 'freedom oriented' exactly... That is what they became in response to lockdowns. They're kind of the soft white nationalist party that no one takes very serious but if you're a closet racist you vote for them. Not having a go just pointing that out.
That's an interpretation and an opinion (which is fine, but let's just recognize that).
Outside of the Duopoly (The Unaparty) of the Labs/Greens - Libs/Nats, who else is there? One Nation have a much longer history and have had more success than Chicken Parma UAP. I guess the Lib Dems also have some history, but I think they are much less well-known that ON.
I think you're correct in saying that they aren't really "freedom-oriented", to some extent, but this is how I see it: The entire world is undergoing a transformative process. Good and Evil are being separated. Like the biblical separation of the wheat from the chaff. Sheep from the goats. There is no longer a foundation for the middle ground, where what is good and what is evil are hidden.
Part of this process is the separation of Freedom and Liberty and Tyranny. People are waking up to the reality that freedoms are real, but so is tyranny.
Prior to 2020, the middle ground was really fuzzy, and only loonies like the anons and conspiracy theorists could see the demarcation clearly.
In other words, through 2020-2021, People have begun to take sides. Either, you work for or are deluded into thinking slavery is freedom, or you are awake and standing up for freedom (or you are still somewhere in the middle ground in the process of waking up).
This process is transformative. So, political parties and entities that have elected to stand on the side of Freedom are becoming more and more "Freedom oriented" while those that have elected to stand up for the Matrix and the Globalist / Communist agendas are becoming more and more "Tyranny oriented" .
Where people stood 5 years ago, or 20 years ago, or 50 years ago is not really the key factor here. It's which side you elect to stand on, now, and moving forward.
ON that basis, I stated that one Nation is "Freedom-oriented", and I'll stick to that claim. Are they 1776 US constitutionalists? heck, no. But compared to the Lab/Lib unaparty clique, they are way, way more closer to "freedom principles" than not.
PS. I know of oodles of people who are awake now and who definitely voted for One Nation in the recent fed election who are NOT closet racists.
I appreciate you sharing your view and opinion, but personally, I disagree.
Signed, citizen of Danistan.
thanks for the detailed response. I also gave them them a cheeky vote. I here what you are saying about transformation, just as the republican party is becoming the MAGA party. Pauline, bless her heart, isn't blessed with the gift of the gab in a way that people can look beyond her boganism. They also don't really have the potential to ever become a major political force here, lets be complete honest. UAP just spent millions on trying to become that and failed quite miserably.
I agree with you about Miss Hanson, and also, regarding the potential of ON to become a major political force (certainly not on their own).
But some of the ON senators have been significant in raising awareness and contributing to the Great Awakening that is unfolding in Australia.
Either way, I consider them freedom-oriented at this point. Normie-like levels of freedom, but they are not, as far as I can see, in with the Lib/Lab establishment, or the cultural marxist clique. That's good enough for me at this point to consider them 'freedom-oriented'.