Sussmann is a little fish. What is important is that evidence has been entered into a court of law which then can be used to catch the bigger fish. When additional trials occur, the evidence introduced will be used again, which will produce more evidence. The net is getting tighter, and the bigger fish will be trapped.
This trial pointed the finger at 2-3 additional people, including the top Dawg.
Lying to the FBI is not sedition. We want the trial for sedition against the US.
The wheels of justice grind ever so slowly, but grind they do and sometimes to a pulp. That is what I hang my hope on to. Everything has to be done by the book.
Sussmann is a little fish. What is important is that evidence has been entered into a court of law which then can be used to catch the bigger fish. When additional trials occur, the evidence introduced will be used again, which will produce more evidence. The net is getting tighter, and the bigger fish will be trapped.
And when will these “additional trials” take place? I’ve heard promises of trials for years at this point.
This trial pointed the finger at 2-3 additional people, including the top Dawg. Lying to the FBI is not sedition. We want the trial for sedition against the US. The wheels of justice grind ever so slowly, but grind they do and sometimes to a pulp. That is what I hang my hope on to. Everything has to be done by the book.
I don’t know man. I’m a practicing attorney and just don’t agree. Believe what you want if it makes your existence easier.
a handshake account referencing a mainstream-controversial character saying they're concerned - color me shocked.