Give me a break dude. Does EVERYONE here at GAW see Reality as Delusions and Misdirection? This nation is toast right now and no amount of posting or “NCSWIC” banners gonna make it any better or less painfull.
Where did I say I’m concerned? Concerned about what? On the contrary, I’m only suggesting that the levels of hopium that this case inspired, and the amount of spin that will be used to interpret the acquittal, is all bullshit and unfounded.
I'm not happy at this outcome but it is true that the net is widening from this trial. More and more evidence is coming in. But we need something to happen soon. People are losing their patience. Lot's of "good news" with nothing really happening (thus far.)
All the documents (aka evidence) and testimony can now be used going forward.
Also, Durham (mostly) stopped the attorney client "privilege" regarding many documents. (This will carry forward.)
So, the upcoming cases are also going to add to this. AND this evidence from Sussman can be used in the upcoming cases.
I'm as pissed as anyone here, but not shocked by what happened. And in the end, if we are to change the D.C. System, we have to get it on record just how corrupt it is. Q said Sussman was a cooperating witness how many years ago?
That’s not how any of this works. Admissible evidence is admissible evidence, and privileged evidence is privileged evidence. In each case, the evidence existed as such (either admissible or privileged) before the trial and will continue to be so in the future. Of course, admissibility is dependent on the fact in the case. Regardless, your comment makes no sense from a legal perspective.
I don’t know man. I’m a practicing attorney and just don’t agree. Believe what you want if it makes your existence easier.
a handshake account referencing a mainstream-controversial character saying they're concerned - color me shocked.
Give me a break dude. Does EVERYONE here at GAW see Reality as Delusions and Misdirection? This nation is toast right now and no amount of posting or “NCSWIC” banners gonna make it any better or less painfull.
Yes, yes they do.
Where did I say I’m concerned? Concerned about what? On the contrary, I’m only suggesting that the levels of hopium that this case inspired, and the amount of spin that will be used to interpret the acquittal, is all bullshit and unfounded.
I'm not happy at this outcome but it is true that the net is widening from this trial. More and more evidence is coming in. But we need something to happen soon. People are losing their patience. Lot's of "good news" with nothing really happening (thus far.)
More and more evidence is coming in? Of what exactly? And I’m not sure the veracity of this “evidence” is meaningful (see, e.g., this verdict).
All the documents (aka evidence) and testimony can now be used going forward. Also, Durham (mostly) stopped the attorney client "privilege" regarding many documents. (This will carry forward.)
So, the upcoming cases are also going to add to this. AND this evidence from Sussman can be used in the upcoming cases.
I'm as pissed as anyone here, but not shocked by what happened. And in the end, if we are to change the D.C. System, we have to get it on record just how corrupt it is. Q said Sussman was a cooperating witness how many years ago?
That’s not how any of this works. Admissible evidence is admissible evidence, and privileged evidence is privileged evidence. In each case, the evidence existed as such (either admissible or privileged) before the trial and will continue to be so in the future. Of course, admissibility is dependent on the fact in the case. Regardless, your comment makes no sense from a legal perspective.
Yeah I’m starting to believe we’ve all been strung along, we continue to lose and the goalposts continue to move.