We get these shills that set their own goalposts then go "See? Failed". They never asked what my goalposts were. No, they try to claim their goalposts are mine.

Even if Sussman had been convicted it would have been a slap on the wrist like Clinesmith. I've said this for months. This is a rico case. You use the small fry to go for the big fish.

But shills are like "NOOOOOO. Small fries are imPOrtANt."

If Sussman had been convicted then the FBI would have been proven as blameless in this. Think of all the evidence that came out because of the Sussman investigation. We know about Joffe. All of that is being used by Alfa Bank in their case against Fusion GPS. Much of the Sussman case is being used by Alfa Bank to win Discovery.

As sleepydude said, you have to have evidence for Discovery, but only Discovery gets you the evidence.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-the-sussmann-trial-revealed-hillary-clinton-e2-80-99s-role-in-the-alfa-bank-scandal/ar-AAXz6Fo

For Democrats and many in the media, Hillary Clinton has long held a Voldemort-like status as “She who must not be named” in scandals. Yet, there was her former campaign manager, Robby Mook, telling a jury that Clinton personally approved a plan to spread the claim of covert communications between the Trump organization and the Russian bank. It was one of the most successful disinformation campaigns in American politics, and Mook implicated Clinton as green-lighting the gas-lighting of the electorate.

The mere mention of Clinton’s name sent shockwaves through Washington. In past scandals, the Clintons have always evaded direct responsibility as aides were investigated or convicted, from the Whitewater land dealings to cattle futures. Even when long-sought documents in Whitewater were discovered outside of the family quarters and bearing Hillary Clinton’s fingerprints, Washington quickly moved on.

Clinton was not supposed to be the object of the Sussmann trial, because Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee, issued a series of orders limiting the scope of the trial and its evidence. The orders were viewed as “spar[ing] the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee … potential embarrassment.”

Yet, even after winning such limiting orders, it was the defense that called Mook to the stand — out of order, in the midst of the prosecution’s case, because he was scheduled to leave on vacation — and he proceeded to confirm that Clinton herself approved of the tactic.

Fainting couches were overrun by panicked leftists as the finger was pointed at Clinton during the trial. Washington collectively gasped and squealed in horror the Mook would say this in a trial. How dare he!