Sussman not guilty is no surprise and is not a setback. The jury believed Sussman and not the FBI. Might be giving the jury too much credit, but if Sussman didn’t lie to the FBI tthe logical conclusion is the FBI knowingly participated in a conspiracy. Credit to u/MeanOMan for this perspective. - The Great Awakening

275

Sussman not guilty is no surprise and is not a setback. The jury believed Sussman and not the FBI. Might be giving the jury too much credit, but if Sussman didn’t lie to the FBI tthe logical conclusion is the FBI knowingly participated in a conspiracy. Credit to u/MeanOMan for this perspective.

posted 2 years ago by TSearch 2 years ago by TSearch +275 / -0

The Sussman single, low level charge was and is an interesting opening gambit. Yes, we will have to endure fake news on how this blows the Durham investigation up. But they will never admit this trial was used to introduce the reality of the conspiracy into an official record. And, the distinct possibility this charge and trial was more about that, than wanting/needing a conviction.

Had he been convicted the FBI would be having a party. It would have given them plausible deniability. The conspiracy would be resting squarely on Hillary’s and the DNC’s shoulders. His acquittal implies the opposite, they knew who he represented and chose to engage in the conspiracy.

Interestingly, even if Sussman did not lie to the FBI, he still participated in a conspiracy to influence the 2016 Presidential election. Will he be charged with that in the future? Or, has he possibly already cut a deal on the more serious charges?

Thanks to u/MeanOMan for opening my mind to this perspective!

As always, only time will tell.

71 comments

71 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (71)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– TSearch [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

We could argue all day about the role nullification versus materiality played in the verdict. And you may well be right.

But does the verdict change the fact that this trial demonstrated the FBI knew the allegations were false and pursued an investigation anyway?

Does it change the fact that this trial demonstrated that Hillary and the DNC knew they were pushing disinformation?

And that this trial demonstrated there was a far ranging conspiracy to falsely make it appear Candidate Trump was a Russian Operative?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You are totally right, it does not change that fact. Even when a guilty verdict would have benefited a branch of the DS, the judicial system is so tainted it could not convict a deep stater.

So Durham has skillfully shown their was a conspiracy. But does it accomplish anything if he can’t get a fair trial in a DC court? Surely he knows that, but does he have a strategy to deal with it remains to be seen.

Amen to that!