Many phones automatically do what is called "dynamic tone mapping". They snap a quick succession of photos at several various exposures, then combine the best parts while removing the under/overexposed areas. So there technically is no "Photoshop" per se, it is all happening inside the phone's capture software. This is why both the sky is nicely exposed, and the fine details on the lawyers dark suits.

Watching the video version from another comment, this moment clearly happened, so I'd recommend you stop with the "it's photoshopped" mantra, because it only highlights your knowledge gap regarding photo capturing techniques.

It does raise the question though. Is tone mapping an image modification technique that could affect evidence used in court? Sometimes the tone mapping process can introduce color artifacts that were not in the original images. It messes with the overall integrity of brightness levels in an image, which can create an oversaturated fantasy kind of effect on an image.