i think was was once like you, in the sense that i thought if i could ask a tough question that someone was unable to answer, it somehow meant that i was right, and they were wrong.
your question of, "the goal of showing the public a this photo shopped picture"
is a legitimate question, for sure.
the fact that i don't know 100% why they did it, ... is irrelevant to the fact that the picture is photoshopped.
example: a witness says he saw a man shoot another man. witness doesn't know 100% why the man shot the other man, only that theres a dead body laying there now.
but generally speaking, the reason that they keep telling you lies, is to keep you misinformed to the point of helplessness.
When Ronald Reagan became President, he had a Cabinet meeting, where he asked everyone, to go back to their respective departments, and figure out what it is that each department does, and then report back to the President,
Later, when the head of the CIA reported back to the President, on the role of the CIA, he said, quote,
"we will know our disinformation program is complete, when everything the american public knows is false"
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm trying to have you elaborate for me so I can see it in your point of view because my brain tells me the picture is not false. But it's like you are refusing to give me that respect by refusing to answer any of my questions that I am asking in the most respectful manner. So because I am being denied an actual conversation to a person who made a statement where I assume the person wants me to think like them the best way you are going to convince me is to answer my questions but leaving me in the dark instead has my brain telling me something different and so it's unkind not answering the questions especially on a topic you are bringing up.
And if the disinformation program is complete by you knowing this picture is fake without being able to articulate your point of view then wouldn't that mean the objective is complete?
i think was was once like you, in the sense that i thought if i could ask a tough question that someone was unable to answer, it somehow meant that i was right, and they were wrong.
your question of, "the goal of showing the public a this photo shopped picture"
is a legitimate question, for sure.
the fact that i don't know 100% why they did it, ... is irrelevant to the fact that the picture is photoshopped.
example: a witness says he saw a man shoot another man. witness doesn't know 100% why the man shot the other man, only that theres a dead body laying there now.
but generally speaking, the reason that they keep telling you lies, is to keep you misinformed to the point of helplessness.
When Ronald Reagan became President, he had a Cabinet meeting, where he asked everyone, to go back to their respective departments, and figure out what it is that each department does, and then report back to the President,
Later, when the head of the CIA reported back to the President, on the role of the CIA, he said, quote,
"we will know our disinformation program is complete, when everything the american public knows is false"
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm trying to have you elaborate for me so I can see it in your point of view because my brain tells me the picture is not false. But it's like you are refusing to give me that respect by refusing to answer any of my questions that I am asking in the most respectful manner. So because I am being denied an actual conversation to a person who made a statement where I assume the person wants me to think like them the best way you are going to convince me is to answer my questions but leaving me in the dark instead has my brain telling me something different and so it's unkind not answering the questions especially on a topic you are bringing up.
And if the disinformation program is complete by you knowing this picture is fake without being able to articulate your point of view then wouldn't that mean the objective is complete?