Sussman verdict flow chat. Easy to understand even for the epic doomers!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (122)
sorted by:
you don't know that he lied... you don't know this wasn't Baker setting Sussman up as the fall guy...
All you have is a lying POS Baker's testimony that Sussman lied AND tricked him behind closed doors. Nobody else in the room... no recording of the conversation... nothing...
EVEN IF you did have that... you would also have to believe Sussman tricked Baker into opening the investigation...
open your eyes please... if the logic keeps steering you off the cliff, maybe your logic isn't as logical as you thought..
its very tiring trying to fix the logic of everyone that is too lazy to fix themself.. but I guess that's my war... my job...
They also had his text the day before saying that he was not coming on behalf of any client. The defense conceded that this was a lie, and that it was even the same lie the prosecution was arguing Sussman told to Baker the next day - the same lie he was being charged for - but because the case was about whether or not he told this lie on the 19th, it didn’t matter that he previously told it on the 18th. They even argued that it was unlikely Sussman would have told this lie on the 19th, in person, because he already told it on the 18th, in text, and to repeat it would have been redundant.
this is correct
https://nypost.com/2022/05/18/durham-team-reveals-damning-text-from-hillary-clinton-lawyer-sussmann-to-fbi/
This doesn't mean that this text and meeting with Baker wasn't a plan to go around the rules of FBI and not open up an investigation sourced from a political opponent.