I used to live in an apartment near a hospital where I worked. It just so happened to be near "Boys Town" in Chicago. I thought I was getting Wrigleyville, home of baseball and frat boys. I ended up with Pride to the south and a war between GDs and Latin Kings to the north, complete with body count! Needless to say, I met all kinds.
Generally, I'm with you. Biology answers the question about "normal" and "natural" or not. Biology's essential and existential drive is to reproduce. Homosexuals deliberately avoid the behavior necessary to pass on their genes. So, whatever drives the behavior, it is maladaptive and deleterious. "Natural" means biologically capable of reproducing and willing to do it. So, no, being gay isn't normal or natural. I don't care if you found a gay penguin. I found a gay human too. There are 7 billion humans on the planet. This one's defective.
Now, morally, does that mean I need to mistreat someone over it? Nope. Nor would I suggest that be done with someone with Down's Syndrome or any other imperfection biology has seen fit to challenge a person with. Do unto others, as they say. There are a great many interesting, smart, and capable homosexuals out there who should be allowed to live their lives, and ideally to contribute to society in productive ways. We have several very notable ones in the conservative movement. Just keep your bedroom behavior in the bedroom where it belongs.
But no, it shouldn't be promoted. It shouldn't be encouraged. We shouldn't be glorifying the behavior as if it's a good thing. It's not. It's a filthy, disease-prone behavior that destroys the muscles of the rectum and eventually leaves a man incontinent of bowel, or dying early of some sexually transmitted disease. It damn sure shouldn't be promoted to kids. Kids have enough struggles growing up without being turned into a battlefield for cowardly socialists too chickenshit to fight their own battles with adults like me who can take their warped views, expose them, and embarrass them for it. No, they go after young impressionable kids and try to weaponized them against their parents or groom them for their own exploitation. The pride flag is a symbol of a wholesale cultural war on religion and the traditional family, and it should be treated as such. It deserves the same sort of treatment we give to the flag of the Third Reich.
I used to live in an apartment near a hospital where I worked. It just so happened to be near "Boys Town" in Chicago. I thought I was getting Wrigleyville, home of baseball and frat boys. I ended up with Pride to the south and a war between GDs and Latin Kings to the north, complete with body count! Needless to say, I met all kinds.
Generally, I'm with you. Biology answers the question about "normal" and "natural" or not. Biology's essential and existential drive is to reproduce. Homosexuals deliberately avoid the behavior necessary to pass on their genes. So, whatever drives the behavior, it is maladaptive and deleterious. "Natural" means biologically capable of reproducing and willing to do it. So, no, being gay isn't normal or natural. I don't care if you found a gay penguin. I found a gay human too. There are 7 billion humans on the planet. This one's defective.
Now, morally, does that mean I need to mistreat someone over it? Nope. Nor would I suggest that be done with someone with Down's Syndrome or any other imperfection biology has seen fit to challenge a person with. Do unto others, as they say. There are a great many interesting, smart, and capable homosexuals out there who should be allowed to live their lives, and ideally to contribute to society in productive ways. We have several very notable ones in the conservative movement. Just keep your bedroom behavior in the bedroom where it belongs.
But no, it shouldn't be promoted. It shouldn't be encouraged. We shouldn't be glorifying the behavior as if it's a good thing. It's not. It's a filthy, disease-prone behavior that destroys the muscles of the rectum and eventually leaves a man incontinent of bowel, or dying early of some sexually transmitted disease. It damn sure shouldn't be promoted to kids. Kids have enough struggles growing up without being turned into a battlefield for cowardly socialists too chickenshit to fight their own battles with adults like me who can take their warped views, expose them, and embarrass them for it. No, they go after young impressionable kids and try to weaponized them against their parents or groom them for their own exploitation. The pride flag is a symbol of a wholesale cultural war on religion and the traditional family, and it should be treated as such. It deserves the same sort of treatment we give to the flag of the Third Reich.