What a sucky article. First, I'm not from Arizona so I don't know who the players are. Secondly, the author of the article should have done a much better job of saying who the players are and how they interact with the story. Sounds like someone did some ballot harvesting, the AG then goes to a newspaper and talks with someone there. And finally someone leaves the country. OK, now explain how all of these acts interconnect. Lousy reporting at its finest. Ashlanddog gets an "A" for effort to bring light to vote tampering, but the story author gets an "F" for screwing up the timeline and not providing enough cohesiveness throughout the story.
What a sucky article. First, I'm not from Arizona so I don't know who the players are. Secondly, the author of the article should have done a much better job of saying who the players are and how they interact with the story. Sounds like someone did some ballot harvesting, the AG then goes to a newspaper and talks with someone there. And finally someone leaves the country. OK, now explain how all of these acts interconnect. Lousy reporting at its finest. Ashlanddog gets an "A" for effort to bring light to vote tampering, but the story author gets an "F" for screwing up the timeline and not providing enough cohesiveness throughout the story.