Obviously not.
(I suspect my response is quite similar to yours when you encounter someone with some obvious 'canned ' Q is bullshit comment..)
There are rather many judges, which you would know if you hadn't formed an opinion based on parroting what one sketchy as all hell character was spouting a couple of years ago and stuck to it without any further thought or inquiry...
The judges were the first to hint at frequency specific UV watermarks and rfid geo-tagging of ballots, they have rather a lot of firsts and have been consistently accurate and ahead of the game, they were very vocal about people staying away from Washington on Jan 6, they were the ones first exposing that DC was a ghost town with empty government buildings, the underground war and much more.
But don't take my word for it, do your own digging, or simply keep an eye on their GAB and see for yourself that they are consistently ahead of the game.
There are more than one that use that GAB account and the judges are field personnel so the tone is somewhat reflective of this at times(people that are in the shit aren't always known for their smooth surface of maturity, look at actions and facts rather than get distracted by the tone with which it is presented)
Not a fan but the info is good and accurate and they are a very good source of the kind of info that basically serves as an advanced warning/indication of what is happening next if you just use some discernment and ignore the rough and tumble nature of some of the judges that use that GAB.
Is this you OP?
https://h4ckerrogue.wixsite.com/h4ckerrogue/post/what-we-can-learn-from-plants
You should look into h4ckerrogue before using the fucker to attempt an argument...
https://8kun.top/4truth/index.html
Not arguing, why so defensive, simply asking a question ....are you Dark Judge?
Obviously not. (I suspect my response is quite similar to yours when you encounter someone with some obvious 'canned ' Q is bullshit comment..)
There are rather many judges, which you would know if you hadn't formed an opinion based on parroting what one sketchy as all hell character was spouting a couple of years ago and stuck to it without any further thought or inquiry...
The judges were the first to hint at frequency specific UV watermarks and rfid geo-tagging of ballots, they have rather a lot of firsts and have been consistently accurate and ahead of the game, they were very vocal about people staying away from Washington on Jan 6, they were the ones first exposing that DC was a ghost town with empty government buildings, the underground war and much more.
But don't take my word for it, do your own digging, or simply keep an eye on their GAB and see for yourself that they are consistently ahead of the game.
There are more than one that use that GAB account and the judges are field personnel so the tone is somewhat reflective of this at times(people that are in the shit aren't always known for their smooth surface of maturity, look at actions and facts rather than get distracted by the tone with which it is presented)
Not a fan but the info is good and accurate and they are a very good source of the kind of info that basically serves as an advanced warning/indication of what is happening next if you just use some discernment and ignore the rough and tumble nature of some of the judges that use that GAB.
https://gab.com/ROYALMRBADNEWS