When anti gun “experts” want to debate you
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
Yeah but, instead of getting on the defensive and stop using the term altogether, I'd say use it the way it makes more sense, you have designated marksman rifles, you have hunting rifles, you have precision/sniper rifles, why not have a assault rifle category which serves a very clear and specific purpose/has a definite set of characteristics.
My thinking is the more gun owners get defensive over the term, the more leftist sheep think there's some credence to the propaganda.
I could be wrong anyway, but my only point is that TO ME the term makes sense, reasons stated in my op.
There is no "very clear and specific purpose" for an "assault rifle." The AR-15 is used for defense and for hunting.
It's purpose is to shoot and disable/kill whatever it is on the receiving end, the context for that shooting is entirely on the hands of the shooter.
That's what should be made bare to anti-gun freaks, the weapon is not the problem, it's just a tool, whatever it may be called is meaningless, it could be called killing stick for all I care.