Pfizer Quietly Admits It Will Never Manufacture Original FDA-Approved Covid “Vaccines”
(dossier.substack.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
If there is a new FDA-approved vax doesn't it void the emergency approval? Can the emergency one be still in use if there is a "better" one?
Is Phizer gonna show everyone that they're not going to release the "better" one and they're going to jab us with the risky one because they don't wanna be sued?
Does it prove a "better" one wouldn't be that much better if they prefer to use the more risky one instead (at our expense - money wise and health wise)?
The EAU is what the pharmaceutical industry is hiding behind. There is no officially approved COVID vaxxxines that are available. The redefining of what a vaccine is in comparison to gene therapy is another matter.
Comirnaty is the only FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine made by Pfizer for BioNTech. It is not available for use in the USA. These mandates are driven by the bait and switch of the FDA that we "now have an approved vaccine". We do not have an approved vaccine in America.
According to the FDA letter, it looks like that Pfizer BioNtech labeled shot is still under EUA (liability shield), while their re-branded Comirnaty, which likely won't be produced until 2023, is the one that was "approved" by the FDA (no liability shield). So, I'd imagine some genius under mandate, or lawyers, will request the Comirnaty (approved version) from their employer, then when its not available to be given, they will file a wrongful termination lawsuit. Of course, the argument on the other side will be the claim that both are the same chemical compounds. Which, even if true (it appears so), then why the two distinct legal entities? (other than to shield Pfizer from liability) Hint: FDA Switcheroo.