Pfizer Quietly Admits It Will Never Manufacture Original FDA-Approved Covid “Vaccines”
(dossier.substack.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
It's obvious Big Pharma is too Big to be sentenced to prison time for any of it's crime convictions. Sure, we might see the rare 'show' trial of someone that refuses to play the game, but never do we see accountability to the vast majority of crimes committed in Big Pharma. Instead of crimes, they are provided "settlements". that is, 'fines'.
Has anyone seen the astounding list of repeated conviction of crimes that Big Pharma gets away with? Any other company committing a single one of these crimes would jeopardize their license to operate. The company leadership would be prosecuted for criminality and would face prison time.
Is this the reason why there's a revolving door between the FDA and Big Pharma? Is it their safety net? What FDA or CDC heads are ever prosecuted for the crime convictions of the pharmaceutical company they headed?
Wikipedia provides a list of list of the 20 largest pharmaceutical settlements (ergo, convictions), but the list is at least 10 times larger for all the convictions over the years. I have seen this list, but now can't seem to find it now. It appears the pharmaceutical industry is provided a perpetual string of settlements instead of spending prison time for the conviction. Here is a List of largest pharmaceutical settlements
In "Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients", the author, Ben Goldacre argues that "the whole edifice of medicine is broken", because the evidence on which it is based is systematically distorted by the pharmaceutical industry.
What an understatement that is. It's a mafia that has taken over the federal government and 200,000 Americans die every year due to prescription drugs alone. This doesn't address maiming and injuring the millions of more Americans.
Why does government protect Big Pharma? The reason is it has become a very effective instrument of death. All governments, especially centralized governments partake in democide; the killing of its own citizens for money and power. Centralization of government has a nasty habit of making those in seats of power, especially when they don't answer to the public, to think of themselves as modern day gods.
HeyTewdryg, I've enjoyed many of your posts on GAW, and tend to agree with you most of the time.
I do not disagree with you here, but I want to challenge you to consider thinking about all of this and similar issues from a different perspective.
When the Founding Fathers experienced the crimes against human (fundamental) rights that the British government was inflicting upon the colonists, they were likely pissed off at first, then it became outrageous, and then they took action.
I am not calling for a revolution, but simply to think about how they went through a mental process of changing their perspective from victim status to empowerment status.
We have been subjected to such abuse by employees of government for so long, that we have started to think from the victimhood viewpoint, when we should be thinking from the "we are the boss" viewpoint.
I recently ran across a very interesting federal statute, at 28 USC 2072. Note paragraph (b):
This refers to the rules of federal court, as it relates to rules of procedure and admission of evidence. Did you catch the key words?
Such rules (of court procedure and admission of evidence in a court case) ... SHALL NOT ABRIDGE ... ANY SUBSTANTIVE RIGHT (of the individual).
Why is that there? Because the Constitution DEMANDS that the government (which was created by the Constitution) MUST FOLLOW the natural law principle of the purpose of why a government exists in the first place. From the Declaration of Independence:
"We hold these truths ... that in order to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
The Constitution created a federal government, which derived its just (lawful) powers from the consent of the People. That document requires that the government may NOT infringe on the fundamental rights of the People. The only exception to that is that a particular individual's rights may be violated IF AND ONLY IF it is done through Due Process of Law (i.e. they must be prosecuted and given Due Process).
Much of the frustration that people have today is not understanding or not accepting that the federal government, in particular, has LIMITED AUTHORITY.
If you actually read any executive order, statute, regulation, etc. from the perspective of this LIMITED AUTHORITY, you will ALWAYS find that some sort of color of law is used to "make it look good," but in reality there is NO SUBSTANCE for those situations where they actually violate the law and only pretend to honor it.
A great example was the "CDC guideline" for wearing face masks on public transportation. First off, the CDC is a federal government agency and ONLY has authority (if it has any at all) for (a) federal government employees everywhere, and (b) the general population WITHIN THE FEDERAL TERRITORIES AND ENCLAVES. This means they do NOT have any authority within the States, generally.
When I read their official statement on their "guideline," I looked for the legal clause about where they claim that they had legal authority for this action. In order for the CDC employees to do ANYTHING, the MUST ALWAYS have permission to do it from someone higher than themselves. Sure enough, it was near the bottom of their statement, and they cited specific sections of a specific federal statute.
So, I looked that up, and guess what? That law did NOT provide any authority for any agency to demand face masks on anyone. It was ONLY for (a) "items" (animals, plants, and inanimate objects) coming into the US that might be harmful, and (b) LOCATIONS under federal government control, such as ports of entry in sea ports. And all of it was for quarantines only. Nothing else.
Of course, neither the CDC nor the media mentioned the LIMITS of the jurisdication of the "guideline" (which was not even a regulation demanding anything, but merely a suggestion).
At this point in American history, I suspect that the vast majority of law school graduates themselves have no idea about the truth of federal jurisdication, just as most medical school graduates have no idea bout the truth of Germ Theory.
Now, more to your point, the idea that drug makers could be given "immunity" for harm caused to others is LAUGHABLE.
No person, whether police officer, judge, politician, NIAID director, or CEO of a private drug manufacturing company ... repeat, NO PERSON ... may have immunity for CRIMINAL ACTS. Period.
At MOST, the federal government can tell the courts not to prosecute a criminal or civil case against them. Even that cannot stand if the allegation is about a crime. In any case, the federal government has LIMITED authority, and they have NO AUTHORITY to tell the state courts what to do or not do.
I see no reason why state courts could not hold the drug companies accountable for their criminal actions. And any judges or prosecutors who will not do their duty can be ... REPLACED ... and even ... PROSECUTED themselves.
Finally, most people have heard about the "Miranda warning" when a cop "reads you your rights" when arrested. What most people do not know is that the Miranda case was NOT specifically about reading someone their rights. That was the end result, but the actual key decision by the court was this:
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are concerned, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." -- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966).
In addition, the law on fraud is:
"Fraud vitiates every thing." -- US v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 (1876)
The reason that 28 USC 2072(b) exists is because the RULE OF LAW in America is that NO LEGISLATURE (including Congress), and NO AGENCY can issue any statute or regulation that would violate the fundamental rights of the People.
This would include a so-called "vaccine court" that purports to protect individuals from criminal prosecution and personal liability for criminal acts.
If more of us start thinking in these terms, and use the State governments to hold criminals accountable -- including the corrupt judges and attorneys, THEN we will begin the process of taking back our America.
And not one minute before then.
All of the above is excellent stuff. You are an educated individual and I appreciate your articulate presentation. There's more I could add to this, but the point you make doesn't warrant it. I believe you yourself seem to acknowledge no matter how much the TRUTH is revealed, the collective ignorance in the masses will destroy themselves. This is a biblical precept as well. It takes a generation or more to undo the damage that has been wrought. Cleon Skousen couldn't have been more clear. You stated it in the following:
Indeed. it has been a purposeful act to dumb-down the children being processed through the American education system. Many authors have warned us about it to no avail. It has become an oxymoron to use the words 'educator' and 'education'. Look at how bad it has become with this video.. I watched this as they giggled over their complete ignorance, and said out loud --It's not funny!
Look up 'Law Positive" versus "Common Law". Law schools mainly teach 'Law Positive' with 'Common Law' mentioned in passing. 'Law Positive' is the predominant law of the land. Even the law school students are brainwashed.
It's absolutely true that "fraud vitiates every thing", but it's also true that ignorance also vitiates every Right we have. The laws you mentioned, and there's many more, have been encoded in law for a very long time. They need to be enforced, but their obviously not being heeded. This is the reality of it right now. Who else would not heed to established jurisprudence? It would be a conquering army by subversive acts of undermining the entire foundation of the Constitution.
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you from being My priest. Since you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children. -- Hosea 4:6
For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you have need again for someone to teach you the elementary principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food. -- Hebrews 5:12
“They bend their tongue like their bow; Lies and not truth prevail in the land; For they proceed from evil to evil, And they do not know Me,” declares the Lord. -- Jeremiah 9:3
As you said, the dumbing down was planned.
The problem is as old as mankind.
"Woe unto you, lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge." -- Luke 11:52
"Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! For ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers." -- Luke 11:46
Luke also reports on denouncing the jews for their desires of money and power.
These problems go back a long way.
And yet ... the Age of Enlightenment and the founding of America pushed through all of that.
Are we to roll over and act like victims, or point out that the emperor has no clothes, and the emperor is not in charge, anyway?
Ya gotta start somewhere.
Changing mindset is that somewhere.
The time for identifying the problems has long passed.
It is now time for identifying the solutions, and the American legal principles are the foundation of those solutions.
Again, good stuff. It's all there from a long time ago. Only if people could be taught.
Keep on posting, patriot.