Just for the record, and so moving forward this larp can be spotted immediately: the standard to bring criminal charges is "probable cause" and prosecutors are not barred from bringing charges where it is uncertain if the case can be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" at trial. In fact, it is a rarity that a case could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt before trial because (1) that is the point of trial; (2) charges get filed and defendants arraigned while the investigatory process is ongoing the overwhelming majority of the time; and (3) because of #2, you anticipate gaining the necessary evidence as you approach trial as more evidence is uncovered.
Plus, slam dunk cases usually result in defendant pleas. Take a look at cuck Binger...he could barely get a hair over the probable cause line to charge Kyle. He NEVER got close to beyond a reasonable doubt.
Just for the record, and so moving forward this larp can be spotted immediately: the standard to bring criminal charges is "probable cause" and prosecutors are not barred from bringing charges where it is uncertain if the case can be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" at trial. In fact, it is a rarity that a case could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt before trial because (1) that is the point of trial; (2) charges get filed and defendants arraigned while the investigatory process is ongoing the overwhelming majority of the time; and (3) because of #2, you anticipate gaining the necessary evidence as you approach trial as more evidence is uncovered.
Plus, slam dunk cases usually result in defendant pleas. Take a look at cuck Binger...he could barely get a hair over the probable cause line to charge Kyle. He NEVER got close to beyond a reasonable doubt.