I came across this discussion on this topic. I'm leaning towards the "It was real" camp after reading this and other things lately. The writers of this are based and know about the Kazar Darwinian cover up of true history.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Much of ancient history that weren't told doesn't add up. The Sphinx is a great example. With out even going into the weathering of it, look at how precise the Egyptians were in their buildings. Everything is exact. Now check out the side profile of the Sphinx and it's completely out of proportion. No civilization that had as high of engineering technology as the Egyptians would have made that from new. It was obviously a lion as some point and "recycled" to a monument to a pharaoh.
It goes so much deeper than that.
On the weathering, my wife's dad is a geologist, so I did the same trick I saw in a documentary where I asked him if he could tell what kind of erosion it was. He said that it was wind making the horizontal lines in different densities of rock, and the vertical was clearly water draining along the wall. When I revealed it as the sphinx, he went blank and asked "what does that mean?" I mentioned that the timeframe for that much water is at least 10k years ago range. He didn't want to believe that was possible and so the topic changed.
Yes, the proportions of the head is significant, and even that it was in the shape of a lion. With the rest of the Giza structures in strong stellar alignment, that implies a connection to Leo, which also lines up with the 10-12k year range (or extended out precessions longer). Where by the Egyptologist timeline, would have had the Egyptians build the Sphinx in the shape of a bull.
It really is a fascinating rabbit hole.