This is correct, but I'm pretty confident this is not the whole story or it's comms. The story I read whe it broke is that his BAC was .08, which is the legal limit, and about 3 glasses of wine for an elderly man of his size. I don't believe he would have been booked if thar is what it was.
He killed his brother drunk driving, but thar was decades ago and won't be a factor, but I think he has had other duis in the past ten years which will make for a harser penalty (or would for any plebs in that situation ).
Other points include, waited 4 hours to test (or earlier were lost), and those other duis...they were a bit to quick to claim "that was a different Paul Pelosi"...could be...he does have a son. Either way as I see it the DA hasn't reversed jack.
If the Deep State was in control this wouldn't even be possible.
Not his court date...his arraignment. I'm thinking arraignment generally happens in 24 hours or so and then it's set for court date...could be wrong.
This is correct, but I'm pretty confident this is not the whole story or it's comms. The story I read whe it broke is that his BAC was .08, which is the legal limit, and about 3 glasses of wine for an elderly man of his size. I don't believe he would have been booked if thar is what it was. He killed his brother drunk driving, but thar was decades ago and won't be a factor, but I think he has had other duis in the past ten years which will make for a harser penalty (or would for any plebs in that situation ).
Other points include, waited 4 hours to test (or earlier were lost), and those other duis...they were a bit to quick to claim "that was a different Paul Pelosi"...could be...he does have a son. Either way as I see it the DA hasn't reversed jack.