Why is that not acceptable? It's a word. If words hurt you, you are not an adult. Children are hurt by words...this is why when you would enter kindergarten you learned, "sticks and stones may break by bones but words can never hurt me." Sack up fren.
Couldn’t agree more. Seems disrespectful. “In Christ” would make me think she means Christ would side with her verbiage and thats a little presumptuous
He said mill stone, sure. Im allowed to feel a little weird about this woman's email. I feel weird about the Stew Peters show too. Its fine if other people disagree with me.
If somethings end is to be burned and it's use is of nothing other than to kindle the fire of God's wrath. I see no more Christlike term than faggot. If she posted her own email, obviously she sent that for the viewers, not him.
I get you brother. I was in that boat most of my life, I've only within the past 5 years not. If you aren't being a good ambassador, and representing His family, I get it especially calling His name directly doing this in His name. But I counterbalance it with they are literally faggots, its the truth and we are in a strange war so let the chips fall where they may - higher standards of our own accountability and all still.
Why would anyone think that calling someone "faggot" and then ending the message with "in Christ" would be acceptable?
Maybe should have said, "white washed sepulcher full of dead men's bones", in Christ.
Or children of hell who make converts to their "religion" twice the children of hell as them,
In Christ
Why is that not acceptable? It's a word. If words hurt you, you are not an adult. Children are hurt by words...this is why when you would enter kindergarten you learned, "sticks and stones may break by bones but words can never hurt me." Sack up fren.
As my old mentor used to say, "offense is taken not given".
.
(I offer offense. It's up to you whether you take it or not!)
abomination is worse than faggot in my opinion
Couldn’t agree more. Seems disrespectful. “In Christ” would make me think she means Christ would side with her verbiage and thats a little presumptuous
He said mill stone, sure. Im allowed to feel a little weird about this woman's email. I feel weird about the Stew Peters show too. Its fine if other people disagree with me.
It's presumptuous to say Christ would not. What the fuck do you think calling priest in the temple a den of vipers is equivalent too?
Religion is designed to kill Christianity.
If somethings end is to be burned and it's use is of nothing other than to kindle the fire of God's wrath. I see no more Christlike term than faggot. If she posted her own email, obviously she sent that for the viewers, not him.
Exactly, she did it for the views. Its fine, others may disagree with me but I still feel the same.
I get you brother. I was in that boat most of my life, I've only within the past 5 years not. If you aren't being a good ambassador, and representing His family, I get it especially calling His name directly doing this in His name. But I counterbalance it with they are literally faggots, its the truth and we are in a strange war so let the chips fall where they may - higher standards of our own accountability and all still.
Feelings come and go. Truth stands
Because it is. Shed your brainwashing