No but court precedence and case law suggest that a court would take a concession as evidence in a hearing. I think thats all that the concession would do, yet very important.
It is inconsequential. Not conceding is so the media can't run clips of the concession and act like he's insane for disputing it after agreeing with it.
No court is dealing with this. Ever. They don't have purview in this realm. If it is ever dealt with, it will be done via congress. The judiciary is not involved in the selection of the executive.
Don't forget the reason they had the opportunity in the first place: Marc Elias. Over 360 lawsuits filed beginning in summer 2020. This guy gets scrutiny but not remotely close to the extent he should.
No but court precedence and case law suggest that a court would take a concession as evidence in a hearing. I think thats all that the concession would do, yet very important.
It is inconsequential. Not conceding is so the media can't run clips of the concession and act like he's insane for disputing it after agreeing with it.
No court is dealing with this. Ever. They don't have purview in this realm. If it is ever dealt with, it will be done via congress. The judiciary is not involved in the selection of the executive.
Except many local judges stepped out side their purview and changed election law unconstitutionally.
Don't forget the reason they had the opportunity in the first place: Marc Elias. Over 360 lawsuits filed beginning in summer 2020. This guy gets scrutiny but not remotely close to the extent he should.