That was their plan - try to steal the election, get caught and stopped like in 2016, then sue the crap out of the US, meanwhile 24/7 riots, and tge great reset continues, blaming Trump for the disaster
They didn't expect Trump letting them steal it. That's why the put Biden Harris on the ticket - the two least popular dems.
Now that they have to pretend they won, they have to tell everyone with a straight face that elections are totally legit and the government is not a foreign occupation. And they have to be in charge while the economy crumbles. It was supposed ro be Trump governing while forced vax kills 1/2 the pop.
I'm no expert, but I think it matters because once you concede, you have agreed that you lost, and therefore lose any right to challenge the results legally. By not conceding, Trump can maintain the narrative that he indeed won, and the door for legal challenges stays open.
Isn't needed, it's common sense. You don't hold up the whole country just because someone isn't willing to give up. That is, in part, why the Victor isn't sworn in immediately, to give a small window for evidence to shone.
No but court precedence and case law suggest that a court would take a concession as evidence in a hearing. I think thats all that the concession would do, yet very important.
Conceding is bowing out, or quitting, regardless of reason, like saying "I'm done here" and walking away. Regardless of anything or any reason else, you've thrown in the towel, and are forfeiting further claim on victory, regardless of potential future outcomes.
There are several legal cases where a recount overturned a race, but the person who actually won had already conceded, so the court ruled the recount was moot. Conceding is dropping out.
Under the military organization structure, if it is still being taught properly, the CIC, unless he concedes, remains the CIC because he may have been removed under duress. Technically, under the code as it used to function, Trump and his cabinet would be considered in exile, but he should Technically still be the CIC until he can concede without duress. That's my understanding fwiw.
Unless I'm totally wrong, military tribunal is used during a constitutional crisis. Treason could be the trigger and we know there was foreign influence.
I feel like , maybe....Trump already stopped the worst of it? By winning 16, losing 20. And now we are reconstruction of the United States. That's why inflation is up, stock market down. Just a theory.
To add on a little more, I can understand why Dem(on)s have been destroying the food processing facilities, but what if there's more to it? I wonder if white hats are rolling out an alternate method for providing food that isn't tainted by the satanists...after all, we know they grind up their human victims and add them to our meat
Dang I handn't thought of that being a possibility. Plus let's not forget all the GMOs and chemicals they ingest into these animals before bringing them to market.
Brilliant comment. I just had an AHA moment about the Q post too. Q team wanted them to think they had unrigged the election machines for 2020 just like they did in 2016. Not all Q posts are for us.
That was their plan - try to steal the election, get caught and stopped like in 2016, then sue the crap out of the US, meanwhile 24/7 riots, and tge great reset continues, blaming Trump for the disaster
They didn't expect Trump letting them steal it. That's why the put Biden Harris on the ticket - the two least popular dems.
Now that they have to pretend they won, they have to tell everyone with a straight face that elections are totally legit and the government is not a foreign occupation. And they have to be in charge while the economy crumbles. It was supposed ro be Trump governing while forced vax kills 1/2 the pop.
Trump never conceded. I think that is more important than we realize.
But I also think this point is over exaggerated, as you don't have to concede to lose.
Not conceding could matter in a situation where the winner is disqualified for, say, excessive fraud.
I'm no expert, but I think it matters because once you concede, you have agreed that you lost, and therefore lose any right to challenge the results legally. By not conceding, Trump can maintain the narrative that he indeed won, and the door for legal challenges stays open.
This is correct. By not conceding, you leave the slim possibility that results may still yet be challenged.
I don’t see anything in the constitution saying a new president can be sworn in without a concession. Just saying.
Isn't needed, it's common sense. You don't hold up the whole country just because someone isn't willing to give up. That is, in part, why the Victor isn't sworn in immediately, to give a small window for evidence to shone.
No but court precedence and case law suggest that a court would take a concession as evidence in a hearing. I think thats all that the concession would do, yet very important.
No but Killary never conceded either.
Conceding is bowing out, or quitting, regardless of reason, like saying "I'm done here" and walking away. Regardless of anything or any reason else, you've thrown in the towel, and are forfeiting further claim on victory, regardless of potential future outcomes.
There are several legal cases where a recount overturned a race, but the person who actually won had already conceded, so the court ruled the recount was moot. Conceding is dropping out.
I'm not saying you're wrong...there has been a court that has ruled something on just about anything. But I am deeply skeptical of that claim.
Not conceding means he could be reinstated into office say by a military tribunal.
I don't believe that is a plausible remedy. A plausible remedy is a new election in that situation though.
After a (normal) election, the main importance of conceding is to tell your supporters to 'stop fighting, it's over, go home'.
Trump does not want Americans to stop fighting for their country.
Yes.
Stacy M1 Abrams didn't concede, did she?
Under the military organization structure, if it is still being taught properly, the CIC, unless he concedes, remains the CIC because he may have been removed under duress. Technically, under the code as it used to function, Trump and his cabinet would be considered in exile, but he should Technically still be the CIC until he can concede without duress. That's my understanding fwiw.
Unless I'm totally wrong, military tribunal is used during a constitutional crisis. Treason could be the trigger and we know there was foreign influence.
Yes.
I feel like , maybe....Trump already stopped the worst of it? By winning 16, losing 20. And now we are reconstruction of the United States. That's why inflation is up, stock market down. Just a theory.
To add on a little more, I can understand why Dem(on)s have been destroying the food processing facilities, but what if there's more to it? I wonder if white hats are rolling out an alternate method for providing food that isn't tainted by the satanists...after all, we know they grind up their human victims and add them to our meat
Dang I handn't thought of that being a possibility. Plus let's not forget all the GMOs and chemicals they ingest into these animals before bringing them to market.
Same
Oh, I hadn't thought about that. Very possible!
controlled demolition
devolution
Nicely Concisely Done
I also remember Killary telling Xiden the day after the election not to concede. The plan they had to scrap! Kek
I remember Barry saying, “you don’t have to do this, Joe” when he announced he was running
Ah, so much was said in that one statement...
Brilliant comment. I just had an AHA moment about the Q post too. Q team wanted them to think they had unrigged the election machines for 2020 just like they did in 2016. Not all Q posts are for us.
Q said the drops weren't just for anons. That the deep state read them too so this could have indeed tricked them