Whether or not it was a setup and the group was infiltrated by Fed traitors, the real question is this: Was the action of the police lawful or unlawful?
If the police are acting in violation of law, just because they value their paycheck more than their oath, then that is a serious problem that needs to be fixed by firing police who do that.
Were people arrested for political protest, like the J6 political prisoners were? And in Idaho, which is supposed to be full of people who value liberty?
What is the stated reason for the arrest or harassment by the popo?
You are all focusing on the wrong issue.
Whether or not it was a setup and the group was infiltrated by Fed traitors, the real question is this: Was the action of the police lawful or unlawful?
If the police are acting in violation of law, just because they value their paycheck more than their oath, then that is a serious problem that needs to be fixed by firing police who do that.
Were people arrested for political protest, like the J6 political prisoners were? And in Idaho, which is supposed to be full of people who value liberty?
What is the stated reason for the arrest or harassment by the popo?
FF clear and simple.
Again ... that is the WRONG issue.
Is what the COPS did a violation of law?
What did they CLAIM they were doing to justify their actions?