What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
A lot of this resonates with what I have read/believe, but one thing does not sit right. I dont think Queen Elizabeth I was fighting against the Cabal in anyway. She might have gone against the Vatican, but it would have been for the benefit of the Cabal. Remember, [they] manipulated her dad into splitting off from Vatican and creating the church of England. This was the start of [their] attempt to take control of the Vatican, which did not fully complete until Vatican II.
Not only this, QE1 reign most definitely started the descent into the financial slavery that was perfected under federal reserve 300 years later. She was probably just a puppet being shown the taste of money magic - and in return pushed the early era proto-progressivism. It formed the foundation for the coming creation of the City of London and the bankers' base after the london fire in 1666.
This paved the way for the ascension of the Khazarians, weakening of the monarchy and finally the reign of Queen Victoria when the money magic had completely corrupted the monarchy and they went along with the colonisation agenda - which was purely an evil hatched by the bankers. Britain would never have been an empire without them.
Wasn't Elizabeth 1 black nobility and part of the phoneicians? As they are cabal as you say why wouldn't they want to have all the financial controls in UK which they have now I think?
Why would they want the pope to have power over them?