It's a simple equation.
Imagine you're a NWO head.
The NWO ain't happening anymore. All your plans are on fire and in the process of being retailored just to keep you in some modicum of power...
So, it's back to the Status Quo -- Elites ruling over the Chattel.
The Woke agenda was supposed to destabilize the Nation, and that it did.
But you can't rule over ashes, though some of your comrades might wish to burn it all down on their way to hell.
You, on the other hand, want to go back to how things were; Presidents owned by special interests, Secret Societies keeping it low-key, corporate collusion kept the market in the hands of those who "deserve" it...
Just none of that End-Times Prophecy, Satanic bullshit and child trafficking.
You just want to go back to being a Wizard ruling secretly among the Muggles, with all the Voldemorts and Death-eaters left in a pile of ash.
So, what do you do when you look at the Global Birthrate Crisis you helped create, soon to be a complete collapse of humanity due to the "vaccine" depopulation agenda that only worked within a NWO reality, and is leading to the distinct likelihood all your investments into Bitcoin, Gold, Petro-Dollars, and other naked-shot market stocks are all going up in flames simultaneously and you'll be left penniless and hated by a ravenous mob of Frankenstein's monsters wanting revenge?
FUCKIN' HEEL-TURN!
Everyone was ready to let the bus roll down the cliff, but you had a change of heart once everyone started eating each-other alive. Now you gotta jump in and pump those brakes!
Issue Number 1, the Population.
You gotta reverse the damage done. You gotta get people fuckin' and raising families that don't die, aren't criminals, and will work in your slave mills.
The Agenda now is as follows:
- Ban Abortion
- Ban Contraceptives
- Ban Prostitution
- Ban Single-Sex Schools
- Discourage College and University for Women
- Villainize Same-Sex Couples for contributing to the "Birthrate Crisis"
- Ban Transgenderism and Drag
- Ban Topless Bars and Night Clubs
- Removal of all Woke and "Love is Love" Corporate Propaganda.
- Restrict Simping, such as Thots, Titty-Streamers and Only-Fans on the Internet
- Crack-down on Catfishing
- Restrict Pornography like Japan does, where everything requires censor bars and blurring.
- Teach Sex-Ed in schools at younger and younger ages, with increase focus on encouraging reproductive habits over gratification.
- Set up dating centers around the US
- Ban Tinder, Grindr, and all other "Hook-up" apps.
- Offer completely free Dating Sites (that work and aren't 10% narcissist women, 90% thirsty men), subsidized by tax monies.
- Increase tax-breaks for families with more than 2 children.
- Encourage young women (even minors) to have sex and get married younger.
- Encourage a culture of "promise rings"
- Pay men to marry ugly women.
- Bring back Boy Bands to get young girls attracted to men.
- Push IDOLs, like Britney Spears and those in Japan to get men horny for young/cute over glamour/punk so they can start popping out babies sooner.
Anything and everything that might detract from a population boom MUST GO!
Now, from a Conservative perspective, much of this would be a "YES, PLEASE!" platform. That's the selling-point.
In reality, it's only done to encourage baby-making; not because the nuclear family is valuable; not because it's morally correct; not because it's a Christian thing to do...
No... It's specifically because there is shortage in supply.
You need cattle to be a rancher. If the cattle are sparse, you need to horny them up and incentivize baby-making, not just sex.
Why is this a problem for us Patriots and Anons?
Because it's deceptive and potent. Because it builds upon a moral framework, but goes too far. The heel-turn will be from Radical Authoritarian Liberalism to Radical Authoritarian Conservativism, and it will happen at the drop of a hat with thunderous applause. Our applause.
Some things should be banned, I agree. Other things CANNOT be banned, and will only lead to people being incarcerated for so much as drawing nude anime girls online -- not because pornography is wrong morally, but because:
"The Government has declared you cannot do that. The Science says it does not support a breeding culture. You must breed for the Greater Good™. Obey."
For me, personally, the motive in pushing these bans matters, even if it is the morally correct decision. Over-Enforcement and Control has always been the issue. We shouldn't trade one set of Authoritarian Dictates for another.
We should, instead, ban Authoritarian Dictates and simply incentivize good behavior.
PS... It's happening right now. They're going to toss "Gender Studies" under the bus. My wager is before the end of September. RINOs will lead the way, so they can get in on the ground floor of the Conservative Authoritarianism.
This is what we've had for thousands of years. If we're at the point of questioning everything, how do we know this isn't what's best? None of us have seen that modeled well, just straw-man examples of bad behavior. We can do the same for other good things. Cars should be illegal because they can kill people, for example.
I think you're picking up the fact that society is probably going to push hard in the opposite direction, and we're going to need to moderate how extreme things get, but we are in undiscovered country regarding anyone but the WW2 generation as far as this point you raise. Millennials, and Gen X'ers as a whole never knew how familes were the radical womens rights stuff hit our parents and grandparents. Lots of media programming, but no first-hand experiences as a whole, and certainly not as adults and not as ignorant children. Even conservative households with one-breadwinner was affected by the 60s.
When I say a MAN-led family, Sharia law and throwing women in full-body robes that hide everything is more of what I'm talking about. Though it won't get that extreme right off the bat. That's the bullseye, and I'm certain they'd be satisfied just to land close to it.
Look up pictures of Iran before and after Islamic fundamentalism.
But instead of Islam, they're probably gonna move towards a Puritan / Amish type motif; where they'll do something drastic like banning women wearing pants on public property. The push will probably come from a reformed Fashion industry that suddenly starts making things people might wanna wear only to switch hard into making it look like everyone showed up on set for a Jane Austen novel.
I'm not saying they'll get their dream, but this part would be the late-game. First, they gotta bring back the population from the brink. Parlor dresses don't get modern men hard, so it'd be counter-intuitive at this point. After there are enough people, that's when they'll shift to covering up women to "maintain their dignity."