Allow me first to being to mind: hegelian dialectic. Which basically means two things, One:

1. create a problem.
2. allow the problem to fester.
3. appear to listening to the " just" demands of the populace to do something about it
4. superimpose your own " solution" without solving anything but it allows you to exercise more power.

And two: For this to work, you need opposing forces, which are seemingly independent of each other, yet manipulated behind the curtain by the same old same old.

Q posted quite a lot about antifa and the National Socialists. He dropped a thought: think subgroup.

It is quite obvious, Bilderberg -> DAVOS was founded by Prins Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld, spouse to Queen Juliana. Before he went for her panties, he was a SS rider. There are quite a number of pictures showing Bernhard remained a Nazi. While the country of The Netherlands was steeped in recession of the 30-ties, he sailed the IJsselmeer with a boat sporting the NAZI-flag.

He even tried to persuade Hitler to appoint him as Reichskommissar of the Netherlands of wisely, Hitler refused. It is interesting to note that quite a number of National-socilaist policies still are alive and well in The Netherlands.

We all probably know about operation paperclip, that saw the brain-drain of Germany towards the US. Boatloads of scientist were incorporated to push the scientific prowess of the US. That is another potential for the moniker: subgroup.

Thierry Mesyan wrote for voltairenet.org this article, titled: The alliance of MI6, the CIA and the Banderites

https://www.voltairenet.org/article216406.html

There are a couple of reasons why this article is important to read, and it is not about banderites per se, but of a wider strategem employed by the CIA/MI6 to create what?

1. SS incorporated Muslims brotherhood units. It seems there was even a mosque in Munich.
2. Both Banderites and Muslim Brotherhood elements were part of Radio Liberty.
3. the training and deployment of Jihadi elements, making Daesh/ ISIS/ and other groups into black mercenary armies pitted against each other, leading to mass immigration, especially of jihadi elements, which then can be used for different purposes.

Take careful note of who is who and where these people have been parachuted.

Now think of this article: https://orientalreview.org/2021/05/26/the-rumsfeld-cebrowski-doctrine/

It seems as if that has nothing to do with each other but it does. In a strange way, I would say.

https://translate.yandex.com/translate?url=https%3A%2F%2Fglazev.ru%2Farticles%2F153-geopolitika%2F103254-rossija-vojuet-za-sokhranenie-chelovechestva&lang=ru-en

Original article: https://glazev.ru/articles/153-geopolitika/103254-rossija-vojuet-za-sokhranenie-chelovechestva The yandex link is the translation to English.

Glayev discusses several economical systems. Of course, the socialist system is elevated as the dominant system, and sorry to say: eve today it is. Every country has its own implementation. And that goes for the US as well.

What I find interesting is that Glasyev totally glosses over the deeper forces behind the scene, that not even honor the sovereignty of the individual, let alone Nations. Because, if the foundation of their movement is correct, then China would retreat from Tibet, Manchuria, Mongolia, immediately. What he describes is just as much a framework, system of control. I guess he has to in order not to set up the fledgling alliance of Russia and China.

Yet, both system, currently at loggerheads, are of the same cloth.

There are basically two systems: freedom or bondage to varying degrees. As Ron Paul said: let's try freedom for a change.