For a pregnancy that would kill the mother (ectopic/tubal pregnancy) you don’t need an abortion. An abortion is the intentional killing of another human life. A procedure done to save the life of the mother, which inadvertently causes the baby to die because it was not viable and would have died anyway if the mother died, is not the same thing as having an abortion. For the sake of time I won’t get into all the different examples of things that can go wrong during pregnancy that would cause emergency action to be taken but suffice it to say there is no situation where a baby has to intentionally be murdered to save a mother.

Pregnant women who are in a life and death situation go to doctors and ers where a life saving procedure might be done that unfortunately can’t save the baby as well. Pregnant women don’t go to abortion clinics when they are in a life and death situation. That’s a lie the pro choicer tries to use just like the rape and incest examples they always bludgeon us with, which in fact, make up a very tiny percentage of abortion cases. You can bring their lies to light by asking them if concessions were made for rape and incest and the life of the mother, would they be against the rest of abortions and they always answer “well, no, I’d still support abortion b/c I support a woman’s right to choose”. That’s what’s known as a “logical fallacy” in debate and these fallacy’s are some of their favorite ones to use.

They don’t really care about the life of the mother or rape and incest cases. But they think it will garner sympathy for their cause if they prop those up as their examples for abortion being legal, when in reality those cases make up the smallest percentage of reasons why people have abortions. 🤷🏼‍♀️