I saw this telegram post purportedly from Patrick Byrne last night on the chans. I have no idea when he said this. If it was last night or months/years ago. I'm very interested in what people would say in response to this. I don't have any idea how or where to begin to pick this apart. There are so many reasons this is inaccurate but I cannot come up with a coherent disection.
Byrne's statement:
"Q is a psyop. Psyops use truth and lies in such a way that it elicits a response from the observer. From my perspective, Q has set up a true Hegelian Dialectic by waking and mobilizing the sleeping giant (the "righteous" right) against the Deep State (the "evil left).
What is the fight over? Control of the financial reset. No matter what happens, whether the war is won by Q or the Deep State, the financial system will be reset and the winner gets to control the reset.
What if you don't care to be part of this squabble? What if you just want to walk away from the fight? No, neither of these sides will let you take away control of you. control is the ultimate goal of both sides.
I say it all the time...the right wing(Q) and the left wing (DS) are attached to the same bird. By opposing each other they carry the bird in a single direction, together. This is a Hegelian Dialectic."
Who gives a shit what Patrick Byrne or Lin Wood say about Q?
What have they ever done for us?
Also, it’s entirely possible that they are white hats, and their job is to create more confusion… fog of war
Both of those 2 are highly successful at creating confusion.
And frankly, how the hell is patrick byrne relevant in any of this? Why the hell was he meeting at the white house with Trump and officials? Aside from his checking account, how does he have more to offer on election fraud than I do? This has never made sense to me.
Right
Same with the Pillow guy. I love him, but how in the hell are we supposed to think he had the proof of election rigging? That always made me laugh.
I think he's playing a role.... white hat, meant to be a mouthpiece and obfuscate. He was like an opening act, meant to take up time before the main event.
Mike is doing a lot behind the scenes to help the election integrity issue. He funded Lara Logan's new doc Selection code. (out July 18th.)
Is he playing the Shakespearean fool role? Although he is far more likeable than the typical fool in those plays.
And in response to why give a shit about either?
Well, when I watch a play or a movie, certain actors do not take the stage by accident. They were written in there for a reason. These guys didn't just crash the party and take the spotlight on their own. Sometimes, its just a bad script and there was no real reason to put them in to begin with. But these guys have been featured in this shit show far more so than an accidental brain fart when writing. So I do not ignore these people even if I am bothered or confused by what they say or do.
Yeah my hunch is fog of war and taking up air time, until the snow started heating up.