I saw this telegram post purportedly from Patrick Byrne last night on the chans. I have no idea when he said this. If it was last night or months/years ago. I'm very interested in what people would say in response to this. I don't have any idea how or where to begin to pick this apart. There are so many reasons this is inaccurate but I cannot come up with a coherent disection.
Byrne's statement:
"Q is a psyop. Psyops use truth and lies in such a way that it elicits a response from the observer. From my perspective, Q has set up a true Hegelian Dialectic by waking and mobilizing the sleeping giant (the "righteous" right) against the Deep State (the "evil left).
What is the fight over? Control of the financial reset. No matter what happens, whether the war is won by Q or the Deep State, the financial system will be reset and the winner gets to control the reset.
What if you don't care to be part of this squabble? What if you just want to walk away from the fight? No, neither of these sides will let you take away control of you. control is the ultimate goal of both sides.
I say it all the time...the right wing(Q) and the left wing (DS) are attached to the same bird. By opposing each other they carry the bird in a single direction, together. This is a Hegelian Dialectic."
Never liked him or believed him. That aside........ this argument is weak and lame. Yes, it's perceived as a battle between right and left when it's really between good and evil, establishment and outsiders. But that has nothing to do with Q, whether Q is a psy-op or not and makes zero argument for Q being in any way about control yet he makes the central point of his argument .... control. Not even worth thinking about specious claptrap like this.