What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
This is surely a bi-directional strategy, to break up the Federal stranglehold while simultaneously building up the states and localities. I can't help but feel that it's also the only way the Convention of States will be possible.
Was just going to say this.
These are the two reasons the demons are so upset.
Loss of Federal slush funds for them and reinforcement of the states’ individual powers.
Exactly, Wasn't it just a couple weeks ago that some eejit said that the federal gov't is higher than the states?