What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Explain.
Roe v Wade was never decided based on morality or choice.
It was decided because of a non existent "Right of Privacy" that does not exist in the Constitution.
This imaginary "right" is a legal stumbling block for a federal Mandatory Vaccines push.
Furthermore, all the talk about how the current SCOTUS abortion case will somehow overturn Roe v Wade is conditioning the public to accept a faulty premise ... the same way the Gay Marriage License case somehow made Gay marriage legal in all the states automatically.
What happened in the gay marriage license case in SCOTUS was more trickery. That court case was about whether or not one state had to recognize a same sex marriage license from another state. Even if the answer is "yes" (according to SCOTUS), this by no means automatically meant that all states must ISSUE same sex marriage licenses .... it only meant that it had to recognize one from out of state.
Yet, somehow ... magically ... that one court case forced all states to ISSUE same sex marriage licenses.
The same type of trickery will be used here. The Mississippi Abortion case will be upheld and will amazingly somehow kill Roe v Wade. The Right Wing Christians will celebrate.
And then ..... one or multiple Vaccine mandate court cases that have been blocked recently will ... in perfect timing ... be heard by SCOTUS ... now without a troublesome "Right to Privacy" precedent.
Now ... there is no My Body My Choice ... now there is no right to your bodily autonomy and privacy ... and SCOTUS will now have the "legal" moral authority to allow Vaccine Mandates on a federal level.
IT IS A TRAP.
and the fact that NO RIGHT WING PUNDITS are talking about this analysis ..... only shows you how the fix is in.