What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Isn't it interesting how, for 50 years, many believed that the feds had the right to put their blessing on abortion. Not only was that a wrong decision by the SCOTUS BUT the people should have all but rioted at that time--it is and always was murder of an unborn child. Since they did not, this color-of-law decision stood. Now that the decision is rightfully going back to the states, they get to decide whether stupid, evil women have the "right" to murder an innocent and voiceless life. I hope there are enough strong, Godly people who will stand up in the filthy blue states against continuing this satanic practice.
Blue states have entrenched voter fraud like masshole so it won't matter if the people wanted it changed....you wouldn't know.
Yes, I am a masshole but I believe the fraud is everywhere, just worse in this hellhole.