NO !!! - R_v_W being overturned is important on its own merits because it was bad law that created a right not spelled out in the Constitution and eroded states rights by doing so.

The election issues need to be addressed by demonstrating that the methods used to steal the election violated state election law. The precedence has already been set by previous SCOTUS decision so the cases would be slam-dunks if they are presented correctly. For example, if drop boxes are not in the local election laws then any ballots collected that way are illegal. Period. If mail-in ballots are not in state election law than any mail-in ballots are illegal and should not be counted. Period. If signature verification is required by state election law but was not used or ballots that had no signature were counted, those votes should not be counted. Period. If mail-in ballots need to be post marked by election day than any ballots received with a post mark past that date should not be counted. Period. Each issue needs to be addressed individually in court and boiled down to its simplest form - did the election procedure violate state election law. The problem is corrupt local judges and a lack of will by many to keep arguing the case to get it through the various layers that could then put it before the SCOTUS where it would have a national imnplication.