I have written many such science reports (and read many thousands). There are even classes on exactly this topic in both graduate and undergraduate science education. Just because you saw it one way and don't feel mislead by it, doesn't in any way mean what I said is false.
I said, "among" the worst forms of propaganda. Telling lies with the truth is exactly that. Things like this create division in populations that see two different things. Things like this create ways to discredit the information that is presented because it is presented as a lie of context.
Downplaying it just because you didn't see what I saw doesn't in any way mean it doesn't have such an effect on the larger population. Understanding how lies of context rule the world is essential to understanding The Matrix. If we wish to escape The Matrix, we must understand the nuance of exactly such lies of context. Only by seeing the walls of propaganda that contain us, that constrain thought, that create beliefs and division and disinformation can we ever hope to achieve the GA as a group (i.e. the whole world).
Sure, I did that. I shouldn't have. That wasn't the real point however, which you completely ignored in calling me out on that.
The real point was that YOU do not speak for everyone. YOUR reaction didn't in any way refute a single thing I said. The REALITY is that there are classes on this exact topic as a way to reduce lies in science reporting. Because even though YOU didn't have that problem, it is such a common problem, there are classes to try to reduce it's occurrence.
promote division: different people will see different things; believe different thing. Division = loss for We The People. These lies of context are the primary tool used to create that division.
give a path to discredit the information: When data is exagerrated like this, and someone promotes it, it is trivial to "debunk" their statements. "Look how big of a drop it is!" But it's not that big. I mean, in this case it is regardless, and I've stated that many times, but these types of contextual lies promote all sorts of bad information that discredit what may otherwise be good information, or the opposite, promoting as meaningful, something that really isn't.
Your argument could be used for virtually any topic that exists.
My argument is intended to be used for virtually any topic that exists that uses such lies of context. THAT WAS my argument.
I have written many such science reports (and read many thousands). There are even classes on exactly this topic in both graduate and undergraduate science education. Just because you saw it one way and don't feel mislead by it, doesn't in any way mean what I said is false.
slyver is 💯 on this. Your anecdotal exception proves the rule.
Im no slyver shill either lol
I said, "among" the worst forms of propaganda. Telling lies with the truth is exactly that. Things like this create division in populations that see two different things. Things like this create ways to discredit the information that is presented because it is presented as a lie of context.
Downplaying it just because you didn't see what I saw doesn't in any way mean it doesn't have such an effect on the larger population. Understanding how lies of context rule the world is essential to understanding The Matrix. If we wish to escape The Matrix, we must understand the nuance of exactly such lies of context. Only by seeing the walls of propaganda that contain us, that constrain thought, that create beliefs and division and disinformation can we ever hope to achieve the GA as a group (i.e. the whole world).
I can attest to that!
HAHA
Facts are facts
Sure, I did that. I shouldn't have. That wasn't the real point however, which you completely ignored in calling me out on that.
The real point was that YOU do not speak for everyone. YOUR reaction didn't in any way refute a single thing I said. The REALITY is that there are classes on this exact topic as a way to reduce lies in science reporting. Because even though YOU didn't have that problem, it is such a common problem, there are classes to try to reduce it's occurrence.
My point is that using graphs like this:
My argument is intended to be used for virtually any topic that exists that uses such lies of context. THAT WAS my argument.
His point is cover all bases because not everyone is as smart as us. I thought that was obvious?
It's = it is