oh, sorry; I read a comment last week where someone said 'Texas and POTUS' were ruled to have no standing and didn't look into it/remember the specifics from the time - was there 2 separate rulings or something?
Texas had standing, if Texas didn't no one did and the requirement that states only change their electoral law through specified means has zero teeth. And if standing was an issue, it would have been appropriate to hear arguments on that issue rather than deciding it incorrectly off the cuff.
I agree, recent rulings are just what we want BUT... nothing has changed since that incorrect ruling that fucked us. Are they still fucking us now? If so, how? If not, why?
oh, sorry; I read a comment last week where someone said 'Texas and POTUS' were ruled to have no standing and didn't look into it/remember the specifics from the time - was there 2 separate rulings or something?
This was the only one I remember. It was unbelievable.
This court can’t be trusted.
well maybe texas didn't have standing I don't know.
Q+ allowed the steal as part of the sting, so that's probably part of it or something.
Or they were comp'd and white hats used evidence of them being threatened to provide security for them and their families or something.
We don't know for sure why they ruled the way they did.
Recent rulings are BOOM-BOOM-BOOM like the sound of a gavel hitting the table lol.
Texas had standing, if Texas didn't no one did and the requirement that states only change their electoral law through specified means has zero teeth. And if standing was an issue, it would have been appropriate to hear arguments on that issue rather than deciding it incorrectly off the cuff.
I agree, recent rulings are just what we want BUT... nothing has changed since that incorrect ruling that fucked us. Are they still fucking us now? If so, how? If not, why?