The problem is the sites you list as evidence of it being shit are also shit. Like the rationalwiki says Natural News is banned by wikipedia. That makes me more likely to believe Natural News, because wikipedia is known to push an extreme agenda via their site.
Now I generally agree that this Natural News site is probably crap. But people dying from COVID shots is confirmed, and it sounds like FOIA requests confirmed the CDC and others knew about it, as well as lots of other evidence. Natural News can be crap and also be correct here.
That Rational Wiki site says the Natural News founder "claims to be censored" implying he's lying, when having previously mentioned the Natural News is banned from Facebook and Google in the very same article. Obviously the person writing that is illiterate.
The problem is the sites you list as evidence of it being shit are also shit. Like the rationalwiki says Natural News is banned by wikipedia. That makes me more likely to believe Natural News, because wikipedia is known to push an extreme agenda via their site.
Now I generally agree that this Natural News site is probably crap. But people dying from COVID shots is confirmed, and it sounds like FOIA requests confirmed the CDC and others knew about it, as well as lots of other evidence. Natural News can be crap and also be correct here.
That Rational Wiki site says the Natural News founder "claims to be censored" implying he's lying, when having previously mentioned the Natural News is banned from Facebook and Google in the very same article. Obviously the person writing that is illiterate.