No its not. If i was the questioning type i would think they used the multiple person video as a "get out of jail card" and made it for that exact reason. If i was the criminal type i would never say anything incriminating in a group call, or in any call like this as anybody could be earwigging. I may even make some of these "just in case" . Anybody with experience of criminals will know this so this wont work on anybody from the prosecution.
THE 6 JANUARY COMMITTEE IS NOW NULL & VOID...ANYTHING coming out of that sham of individuals is asking for a HOUSE TO BE DROPPED ON THEM:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001
18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally; PERTINENT SECTION:
a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
This is importante
No its not. If i was the questioning type i would think they used the multiple person video as a "get out of jail card" and made it for that exact reason. If i was the criminal type i would never say anything incriminating in a group call, or in any call like this as anybody could be earwigging. I may even make some of these "just in case" . Anybody with experience of criminals will know this so this wont work on anybody from the prosecution.
THE 6 JANUARY COMMITTEE IS NOW NULL & VOID...ANYTHING coming out of that sham of individuals is asking for a HOUSE TO BE DROPPED ON THEM:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001 18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally; PERTINENT SECTION: a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
For anyone using an iPad and unable to access videos posted on Gateway Pundit, here is a link.
https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/exclusive-proud-boys-proven-innocent-in-newly-released-video-hidden-from-public-doj-tried-to-hide-this-leaked-evidence-blows-up-doj-and-liz-cheneys-bogus-seditious-conspiracy-cha/
I admire real men taking a stand!
That video is not evidence of innocence. I know some of you people like hopium but this ain't gonna do nothing for them.
I agree with Celt that the zoom call isn't evidence of innocence pertaining to J6 "crimes" or "felonies"
Sheds light on the intention, which could be beneficial if it got media attention.
Maybe the win here is the video shatters the MSM narrative.