2018 (or around that time) was bad as well for you guys - hope you weren’t too close. Although I do understand not cleaning fuel from the forest floor, Anchorage definitely needs to do better in such a high density area.
But I wonder about tomato juice? What could that symbolize? Grok had several answers. I’m curious about it drinking blood? Why would they chose that, instead of orange juice - you know “Orange Man” and all? Just thoughts…
If anything, it will be interesting to follow! How close will Grok get to all the analysis our bakers and anons have done over the last 7+ years? And how will it be disseminated? Has anyone here thought of asking Grok or Chat GPT to analyze Q posts? What a concept.
So my question as an aging Boomer, is if we put some of our retirement funds into XRP to further diversify our land and other holdings, what is the best rate to look for? Is XRP only going to go up, or should we wait to see how much better we could do for what resources we have?
This is a whole new market for us. We have done very well with property investments, and refinancing to the lowest rate we could get (2.75%).
We are not interested in going through a financial group and would prefer to by outright.
Any thoughts to help us?
Testing testing - I’m trying to post a great little no called Cognitive Dissonance by Brad Barton and the site isn’t giving me ability. Plus all comments on any post seem to be hours old. Don’t know if it is from m end or .win is acting up?
Testing testing - I’m trying to post a great little no called Cognitive Dissonance by Brad Barton and the site isn’t giving me ability. Plus all comments on any post seem to be hours old. Don’t know if it is from m end or .win is acting up?
Reminds me of a time just after 2020 election where I was at the local gun shop buying ammo for my .9 mil. In line before me were two very dark skinned young men buying two .45 handguns - they said in very broken English they wanted as many as they could buy. I think the law here was only two each. They didn’t care what color or make. Made me highly suspicious of a cell in my little burg. Reported it to a friend very high up in the Army, and he said if they were legal, nothing could be done about it.
Reminds me of a time just after 2020 election where I was at the local gun shop buying ammo for my .9 mil. In line before me were two very dark skinned young men buying two .45 handguns - they said in very broken English they wanted as many as they could buy. I think the law here was only two each. They didn’t care what color or make. Made me highly suspicious of a cell in my little burg. Reported it to a friend very high up in the Army, and he said if they were legal, nothing could be done about it.
Thank you for an excellent reply - you are much smarter in this than I am. I just had a jingle in my brain about a concept of the one world government bringing our governance into four distinct regional/global political organizations. See my newest text for my query about it to Grok. I am not smart enough to really understand, but do appreciate those who can discuss it..
I decided to Grok it …
“ The concept of a "North American Union" (NAU) as part of a broader one-world government plan is largely a subject of conspiracy theories rather than official policy. Here's an overview based on available information:
-
Conceptual Origins: The idea of a North American Union is often compared to the European Union, suggesting a political and economic union of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. This concept has been discussed in academic circles and by some think tanks, but there is no official governmental plan to establish such a union. Publications like the Council on Foreign Relations' 2005 report titled "Building a North American Community" have been cited by conspiracy theorists as evidence, but these reports discuss increased cooperation rather than a political merger.
-
Conspiracy Theories: Many conspiracy theories claim that the NAU is part of a "New World Order" or a one-world government agenda. These theories often involve claims of secret agreements to dissolve national borders, introduce a common currency like the "Amero," and centralize governance, essentially eroding national sovereignty. These ideas are propagated through various media, including social media platforms like X, where users discuss fears of losing national identity and autonomy.
-
Official Stance: Government officials from the United States, Canada, and Mexico have repeatedly stated there are no plans for a North American Union. The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which was active from 2005 until it was discontinued in 2009, was often misconstrued by conspiracy theorists as a step towards a union, but it was aimed at cooperation in security and economic matters without any intention of forming a political union.
-
Public and Political Perception: The concept of a NAU has been politically contentious, with some politicians and public figures using it as a rallying cry against globalization or to incite fears of loss of sovereignty. However, these discussions generally remain within the realm of political rhetoric or speculative fiction rather than actual policy implementation.
-
Economic Integration vs. Political Union: While there is significant economic integration through agreements like NAFTA (now USMCA), this does not equate to plans for a political union. The focus has been on trade liberalization and economic cooperation, not on forming a single government across these nations.
In summary, while the concept of a North American Union exists in theoretical and speculative discussions, there is no concrete, official plan for its creation as part of a one-world government initiative. The narratives around this often stem from conspiracy theories rather than from factual policy announcements or agreements.”
Been awhile since I posted anything - but will have to say this: this does seem all theatrical - a show to speak. And the best shows get you involved in the dramatics, hence those who are disappointed in Trump right now, be they anons or regular MAGA.
More and more, I just try to keep to my life and what is immediately affecting me, and the 72 hour rule just automatically takes affect because I’m not letting (albeit “gutteral”) first responses take hold.
I still trust President Trump. For now.